Open and Closed Sets - Sohrab Exercise 2.4.4 - Part 3

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed Exercise Sets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Exercise 2.2.4 Part (3) from Houshang H. Sohrab's "Basic Real Analysis" (Second Edition), focusing on the concepts of open and closed sets in real analysis. Participants clarify that the set \( S = \{ \frac{1}{n} : n \in \mathbb{N} \} \) is neither open nor closed, as its complement does not satisfy the definition of an open set. Specifically, every \( \varepsilon \)-neighborhood of the point \( 0 \) contains elements from \( S \), demonstrating that \( S \) is not closed. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding \( \epsilon \)-neighborhoods in proving these properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of open and closed sets in topology
  • Familiarity with \( \epsilon \)-neighborhoods
  • Knowledge of the Archimedean property of real numbers
  • Basic concepts from real analysis as presented in Sohrab's "Basic Real Analysis"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of open and closed sets in topology
  • Learn about \( \epsilon \)-neighborhoods and their applications in proofs
  • Explore the Archimedean property and its implications in real analysis
  • Review additional exercises from Sohrab's "Basic Real Analysis" to reinforce understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematicians, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of open and closed sets, particularly in the context of Sohrab's work.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Houshang H. Sohrab's book: "Basic Real Analysis" (Second Edition).

I am focused on Chapter 2: Sequences and Series of Real Numbers ... ...

I need help with a part of Exercise 2.2.4 Part (3) ... ...

Exercise 2.2.4 Part (3) reads as follows:

View attachment 7185I am unable to make a meaningful start on this problem ... can someone help me with the exercise ...

Note: Reflecting in general terms, I suspect the proof that $$\mathbb{N}$$ and $$\mathbb{Z}$$ are closed is approached by looking at the complement sets of $$\mathbb{N}$$ and $$\mathbb{Z}$$ ... visually $$\mathbb{R}$$ \ $$\mathbb{N}$$ and $$\mathbb{R}$$ \ $$\mathbb{Z}$$ and proving that these sets are open ... which intuitively they seem to be ... but I cannot see how to technically write the proof in terms of open sets and $$\epsilon$$-neighborhoods ... can someone please help ...

I have not made any progress regarding the set $$\{ \frac{1}{n} \ : \ n \in \mathbb{N} \}$$ ...

Peter
=========================================================================================

The above exercise relies on the definition of open sets and related concepts and so to provide readers with a knowledge of Sohrab's definitions and notation I am provided the following text ...View attachment 7186
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The set $S = \{1/n:n\in\Bbb{N}\}$ is not open, because for example it contains the point $1$ but it does not contain any $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood of $1$. (In fact, the point $1 + \frac12\varepsilon$ is in that neighbourhood but is not in $S$.)

To show from the definition that $S$ is not closed, you are right that one must show that its complement is not open (because that is how closedness is defined). In this case, the point $0$ is in $S^c$, but every $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood of $0$ contains an element of $S$. In fact, given $\varepsilon>0$, choose (by the Archimedean property of $\Bbb{R}$!) an integer $n>1/\varepsilon$. Then $1/n \in B_\varepsilon(0)$.
 
Opalg said:
The set $S = \{1/n:n\in\Bbb{N}\}$ is not open, because for example it contains the point $1$ but it does not contain any $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood of $1$. (In fact, the point $1 + \frac12\varepsilon$ is in that neighbourhood but is not in $S$.)

To show from the definition that $S$ is not closed, you are right that one must show that its complement is not open (because that is how closedness is defined). In this case, the point $0$ is in $S^c$, but every $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood of $0$ contains an element of $S$. In fact, given $\varepsilon>0$, choose (by the Archimedean property of $\Bbb{R}$!) an integer $n>1/\varepsilon$. Then $1/n \in B_\varepsilon(0)$.
Thanks Opalg ... appreciate the help ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K