MHB Open Sets in R^n .... Duistermaat and Kolk, Lemma 1.2.5 ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on seeking clarification and a rigorous proof of Assertion (i) from Lemma 1.2.5 in "Multidimensional Real Analysis I" by Duistermaat and Kolk, specifically regarding the properties of open sets in R^n. The lemma states that a union of open sets is open, and the participants explore the implications of this definition. A detailed explanation is provided, demonstrating that if a point x belongs to a union of open sets, there exists a neighborhood around x that remains within the union, confirming its openness. The thread emphasizes the importance of rigor in mathematical proofs and encourages collaboration for clearer understanding. Overall, the discussion highlights the foundational concepts of open sets in topology.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading "Multidimensional Real Analysis I: Differentiation by J. J. Duistermaat and J. A. C. Kolk ...

I am focused on Chapter 1: Continuity ... ...

I need help with an aspect of Lemma 1.2.5 ...

Duistermaat and Kolk"s Lemma 1.2.5 reads as follows:View attachment 9014In the above proof by Duistermaat and Kolk we read the following:

" ... ... Assertion (i) follows from Definition 1.2.2 ... ..."I have tried to demonstrate a rigorous proof of Assertion (i) but have not been happy it is fully rigorous ...Can someone please demonstrate a fully rigorous proof of Assertion (i) ...


Help will be appreciated ...

Peter ========================================================================================It may help readers of the above post to have access to the start of Section 1.2: Open and Closed Sets ... which includes Definition 1.2.2 referred to above ... so I am providing aces to that text ... as follows ... View attachment 9015
View attachment 9016
Hope that helps ... ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • D&K - Lemma 1.2.5 ... .png
    D&K - Lemma 1.2.5 ... .png
    11.9 KB · Views: 135
  • D&K - 1 - Start of Section 1.2 ... Open and Closed Sets ... .png
    D&K - 1 - Start of Section 1.2 ... Open and Closed Sets ... .png
    5.8 KB · Views: 146
  • D&K - 2 - Start of Section 1.2 ... Open and Closed Sets ... ...Part 2.png
    D&K - 2 - Start of Section 1.2 ... Open and Closed Sets ... ...Part 2.png
    32.3 KB · Views: 144
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose that $U = \bigcup_{s\in S}U_s$ is a union of open sets $U_s$. If $x\in U$ then by definition $x$ must belong to one of the sets $U_s$. Since $U_s$ is open, there exists $\delta>0$ with $B(x,\delta)\subseteq U_s$. Then $x\in B(x,\delta)\subseteq U_s \subseteq U$. Thus every point $x$ in $U$ is in the interior of $U$. So $U$ is open.
 
Opalg said:
Suppose that $U = \bigcup_{s\in S}U_s$ is a union of open sets $U_s$. If $x\in U$ then by definition $x$ must belong to one of the sets $U_s$. Since $U_s$ is open, there exists $\delta>0$ with $B(x,\delta)\subseteq U_s$. Then $x\in B(x,\delta)\subseteq U_s \subseteq U$. Thus every point $x$ in $U$ is in the interior of $U$. So $U$ is open.

Thanks for your help, Opalg ...

Peter
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K