Optical Path Length: Deriving Reflected Light on Lens Surface

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the optical path length of incident light reflected on a lens surface with radius r1. Participants explore the relationship between the two lens surfaces, r1 and r2, and the application of Fermat's principle in this context. A key point of contention is whether to subtract the expression for r1 from r2 or to represent the reflected light ray's velocity as negative. The derivation is acknowledged as complex, requiring careful consideration of these variables.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical path length concepts
  • Fermat's principle of least time
  • Basic geometry of lens surfaces
  • Knowledge of ray optics and light reflection
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of optical path length in lens systems
  • Learn about Fermat's principle in greater detail
  • Explore the mathematical representation of light reflection on curved surfaces
  • Investigate the impact of lens curvature on light propagation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in optics, physics educators, and anyone involved in lens design or optical engineering will benefit from this discussion.

kpl
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Derive the optical length of the incident light being reflected back to the surface of the lens with radius r1.

Homework Equations



i have assumed that the surfaces can be given as r^2 = y^2+z^2
there are 2 surfaces of the lens with radii r1 and r2

The Attempt at a Solution



is it simply subtracting the expression for r1 from the expression for r2?
i have attemped using Fermats principle but cannot get very far
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I remember doing this problem a while back - if I'm right, the derivation is not simple. If nobody replies, give me some time to recall my memory...
 
I don't know if you've managed to do the problem but you were on the right track.

You asked whether or not you subtract the expression for r1 from r2 - that depends if you represented the reflected light ray's velocity as negative or if you've subtracted the entire reflected path. Either way should be fine, though I would probably stick with representing the reflected velocity as negative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K