[Optics] Questions on the Stokes shift

AI Thread Summary
Stokes shift refers to the wavelength difference between the excitation and emission spectra of the same electronic transition. A large Stokes shift indicates greater energy loss, which can negatively impact energy efficiency, while a smaller shift is generally preferred. However, a larger Stokes shift can enhance the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), making it easier to detect fluorescence emissions. The discussion raises questions about the practical implications of Stokes shift and its relationship to SNR. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing fluorescence detection in various applications.
rinalai
Messages
19
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Is it better to have a large or small Stokes shift, from a practical point of view?
Relevant Equations
NA
Here is my answer to this question:

Stokes shift is the difference in wavelength between positions of the band maxima of the excitation and emission spectra of the same electronic transition.
When Stokes shift is large, it means there is more energy loss, which is not favorable regarding energy efficiency. Thus, it is usually better to have a small Stokes shift.
On the other hand, with a larger Stokes shift, meaning that there is a greater wavelength difference between the excitation and emission light, resulting in a higher signal-to-noise ratio(SNR), which makes it easier to identify the fluorescence emission from the particles we are observing.

Are these statements correct?
Any comments and suggestions will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea what it means to be "practical". Practical in what sense?

rinalai said:
On the other hand, with a larger Stokes shift, meaning that there is a greater wavelength difference between the excitation and emission light, resulting in a higher signal-to-noise ratio(SNR), which makes it easier to identify the fluorescence emission from the particles we are observing.
Why do you think that larger Stokes shift lead to higher SNR?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top