[Optics] Questions on the Stokes shift

AI Thread Summary
Stokes shift refers to the wavelength difference between the excitation and emission spectra of the same electronic transition. A large Stokes shift indicates greater energy loss, which can negatively impact energy efficiency, while a smaller shift is generally preferred. However, a larger Stokes shift can enhance the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), making it easier to detect fluorescence emissions. The discussion raises questions about the practical implications of Stokes shift and its relationship to SNR. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing fluorescence detection in various applications.
rinalai
Messages
19
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Is it better to have a large or small Stokes shift, from a practical point of view?
Relevant Equations
NA
Here is my answer to this question:

Stokes shift is the difference in wavelength between positions of the band maxima of the excitation and emission spectra of the same electronic transition.
When Stokes shift is large, it means there is more energy loss, which is not favorable regarding energy efficiency. Thus, it is usually better to have a small Stokes shift.
On the other hand, with a larger Stokes shift, meaning that there is a greater wavelength difference between the excitation and emission light, resulting in a higher signal-to-noise ratio(SNR), which makes it easier to identify the fluorescence emission from the particles we are observing.

Are these statements correct?
Any comments and suggestions will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea what it means to be "practical". Practical in what sense?

rinalai said:
On the other hand, with a larger Stokes shift, meaning that there is a greater wavelength difference between the excitation and emission light, resulting in a higher signal-to-noise ratio(SNR), which makes it easier to identify the fluorescence emission from the particles we are observing.
Why do you think that larger Stokes shift lead to higher SNR?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top