[Optics] Questions on the Stokes shift

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
rinalai
Messages
19
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Is it better to have a large or small Stokes shift, from a practical point of view?
Relevant Equations
NA
Here is my answer to this question:

Stokes shift is the difference in wavelength between positions of the band maxima of the excitation and emission spectra of the same electronic transition.
When Stokes shift is large, it means there is more energy loss, which is not favorable regarding energy efficiency. Thus, it is usually better to have a small Stokes shift.
On the other hand, with a larger Stokes shift, meaning that there is a greater wavelength difference between the excitation and emission light, resulting in a higher signal-to-noise ratio(SNR), which makes it easier to identify the fluorescence emission from the particles we are observing.

Are these statements correct?
Any comments and suggestions will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea what it means to be "practical". Practical in what sense?

rinalai said:
On the other hand, with a larger Stokes shift, meaning that there is a greater wavelength difference between the excitation and emission light, resulting in a higher signal-to-noise ratio(SNR), which makes it easier to identify the fluorescence emission from the particles we are observing.
Why do you think that larger Stokes shift lead to higher SNR?