Optimisation Problem (Global extreme points)

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Foosey96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optimisation Points
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding the global extreme point of the function f(x) = e^(x-1) - x. The derivative f'(x) = e^(x-1) - 1 is set to zero, yielding x = 1 as a critical point. The second derivative f''(x) = e^(x-1) confirms that this point is a minimum since f''(1) = 1 > 0. The confusion arises from the distinction between x-values and y-values, where the minimum value of the function occurs at f(1) = -1, not at x = 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts such as derivatives and critical points.
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of second derivative tests for determining concavity.
  • Ability to interpret function values in relation to their critical points.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the second derivative test in optimization problems.
  • Explore the properties of exponential functions in greater detail.
  • Learn about global versus local extrema in calculus.
  • Investigate how to graph functions to visualize critical points and their corresponding function values.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus, optimization techniques, and function analysis.

Foosey96
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi there everyone, wonder if anyone can help as I'm a bit confused.
Ive been asked to find the global extreme point of f(x)=e^(x-1) - x.
I have checked my answer against the solution and am correct and my working is as follows:
f'(x) = e^(x-1) - 1 = 0. Therefore (x-1)=ln1 (which = 0) therefore x = 1.
f''(x) = e(x-1). sub in x=1 and f''(x) = 1 which is > 0 hence the extreme point is a minimum.
The solution however then goes on to conclude that x*=1 minimizes f(x)
This is what I am confused by as I thought minimum points by their nature were the y-values not the x values and hence x* should actually be e^(1-1) - 1 = 0 and so x*=0 minimizes f(x)??
Thanks for any help you can give that final conclusion has just thrown me off. Thanks everyone!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Foosey96 said:
Hi there everyone, wonder if anyone can help as I'm a bit confused.
Ive been asked to find the global extreme point of f(x)=e^(x-1) - x.
I have checked my answer against the solution and am correct and my working is as follows:
f'(x) = e^(x-1) - 1 = 0. Therefore (x-1)=ln1 (which = 0) therefore x = 1.
f''(x) = e(x-1). sub in x=1 and f''(x) = 1 which is > 0 hence the extreme point is a minimum.
The solution however then goes on to conclude that x*=1 minimizes f(x)
This is what I am confused by as I thought minimum points by their nature were the y-values not the x values and hence x* should actually be e^(1-1) - 1 = 0 and so x*=0 minimizes f(x)??
Thanks for any help you can give that final conclusion has just thrown me off. Thanks everyone!

What they said is correct. To say that x = 1 minimises f(x) is to say that when x = 1 IN the function, then the function value will be at its minimum.

Here the minimum value is f(1) = e^(1-1) - 1 = -1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K