Optimizing Intake Runner Length for a 1.6L 4 Cylinder Engine

  • Thread starter Thread starter heli-mech
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engine Length
AI Thread Summary
To optimize intake runner length for a 1.6L 4-cylinder engine with four 36mm carbs, it's essential to consider that runner length influences the power band, with longer runners favoring higher RPMs. For a daily driver, shorter intake manifolds are recommended, as they enhance power at lower RPMs, which is beneficial for everyday driving. The design of side-draught carbs, which utilize short runners, exemplifies this principle by maximizing low-end power. While specific formulas for carbureted systems may be limited, the general consensus is to keep the runners as short as feasible for optimal performance. This approach aligns with the goal of creating a responsive and zippy vehicle.
heli-mech
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm currently adapting a rack of four 36mm carbs to a 1.6L (97.64 ci) 4 cylinder engine. I'm trying to figure out how to calculate the proper intake runner length to use. This is to be a zippy daily driver, not an 1/8th mile drag car. I've found information on "Independant Throttle Bodies" length calculations for fuel injected systems, but this involves a plenum and does not seem relevant. Any help would be much appreciated.:smile:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I can't help with any formulae. As a general rule, however, your power band is partially governed by the runner length. Longer means your band is in a higher rpm range.
 
As far as I know the whole secret of side draught carbs are in the fact that they have very short intake manifolds producing power from a very low rpm. range. part of the m3 power is the 6 individual throttle bodies mounted directly on to the engine. Suggest you make the runners as short as possible.
 
Thread 'I need a concave mirror with a focal length length of 150 feet'
I need to cut down a 3 year old dead tree from top down so tree causes no damage with small pieces falling. I need a mirror with a focal length of 150 ft. 12" diameter to 36" diameter will work good but I can't think of any easy way to build it. Nothing like this for sale on Ebay. I have a 30" Fresnel lens that I use to burn stumps it works great. Tree service wants $2000.
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top