MHB Optimizing Wireless Internet Coverage for Houses: A Greedy Algorithm Approach

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Signal
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing wireless internet coverage for houses along a road using a greedy algorithm. The proposed algorithm involves placing antennas at strategic points, specifically $k$ meters east of the westernmost house and continuing eastward until all houses are covered. The algorithm aims to minimize the number of antennas needed while ensuring that no house is left without coverage. A correction is made regarding a typo where "5 meters" should have been "k meters." The overall approach is confirmed to be correct, emphasizing the importance of the antenna placement strategy.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

We consider a long country road with $n$ houses placed along of it (we think of the road as a big line segment). We want to put antenna of wireless internet in some places of the road so that we cover with signal all the houses. Each antenna has a range of $k$ meters and can cover as many houses are in its range. I want to describe a greedy algorithm that achieves this goal using the minimum number of antenna. I also want to compute the complexity and prove the correctness of the greedy algorithm. (The input of the algorithm is an array $A[1 \dots n]$, that contains the distances of the houses in an increasing order from the west side of the road. The output of the algorithm will be the number of antenna that were used in total.)

Can you give me a hint what we could do? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have thought of the following algorithm:

  1. We put an antenna $k$ meters east of the westernmost house.
  2. We continue to the east, by placing an antenna $k$ meters east of the first house the distance of which from the previous antenna is greater than $k$. We stop when there are no remaining houses more than $k$ meters east of the last antenna that we put or when the distance of the last antenna that we put from the easternmost house is smaller than $k$.
  3. If the easternmost house is more than $5$ meters away from the last antenna that we put, we put an antenna at this house.

Is it correct? (Thinking)
 
evinda said:
I have thought of the following algorithm:

  1. We put an antenna $k$ meters east of the westernmost house.
  2. We continue to the east, by placing an antenna $k$ meters east of the first house the distance of which from the previous antenna is greater than $k$. We stop when there are no remaining houses more than $k$ meters east of the last antenna that we put or when the distance of the last antenna that we put from the easternmost house is smaller than $k$.
  3. If the easternmost house is more than $5$ meters away from the last antenna that we put, we put an antenna at this house.

Is it correct? (Thinking)

I've looked up the greedy algorithm and I think your approach is correct.
Where did you get the specific $5$ meters though? Shouldn't it be $k$ meters? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
I've looked up the greedy algorithm and I think your approach is correct.
Where did you get the specific $5$ meters though? Shouldn't it be $k$ meters? (Wondering)

Oh yes, that's a typo... I meant $k$... (Nerd)
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top