Optimizing Wireless Internet Coverage for Houses: A Greedy Algorithm Approach

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Signal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on optimizing wireless internet coverage for houses along a road using a greedy algorithm. The proposed algorithm places antennas $k$ meters east of the westernmost house and continues to position them based on the distance of the next house from the last antenna. The algorithm aims to minimize the number of antennas while ensuring all houses are covered. The complexity and correctness of the algorithm are also addressed, confirming its validity with the correction of a typo regarding the distance parameter.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of greedy algorithms
  • Familiarity with distance measurement and coverage concepts
  • Basic knowledge of algorithm complexity analysis
  • Ability to work with arrays and indexing
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implementation of greedy algorithms in Python
  • Learn about algorithm complexity analysis techniques
  • Explore variations of coverage problems in computational geometry
  • Investigate other optimization algorithms for network design
USEFUL FOR

Software engineers, algorithm designers, and network engineers interested in optimizing wireless coverage and understanding greedy algorithm applications.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

We consider a long country road with $n$ houses placed along of it (we think of the road as a big line segment). We want to put antenna of wireless internet in some places of the road so that we cover with signal all the houses. Each antenna has a range of $k$ meters and can cover as many houses are in its range. I want to describe a greedy algorithm that achieves this goal using the minimum number of antenna. I also want to compute the complexity and prove the correctness of the greedy algorithm. (The input of the algorithm is an array $A[1 \dots n]$, that contains the distances of the houses in an increasing order from the west side of the road. The output of the algorithm will be the number of antenna that were used in total.)

Can you give me a hint what we could do? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have thought of the following algorithm:

  1. We put an antenna $k$ meters east of the westernmost house.
  2. We continue to the east, by placing an antenna $k$ meters east of the first house the distance of which from the previous antenna is greater than $k$. We stop when there are no remaining houses more than $k$ meters east of the last antenna that we put or when the distance of the last antenna that we put from the easternmost house is smaller than $k$.
  3. If the easternmost house is more than $5$ meters away from the last antenna that we put, we put an antenna at this house.

Is it correct? (Thinking)
 
evinda said:
I have thought of the following algorithm:

  1. We put an antenna $k$ meters east of the westernmost house.
  2. We continue to the east, by placing an antenna $k$ meters east of the first house the distance of which from the previous antenna is greater than $k$. We stop when there are no remaining houses more than $k$ meters east of the last antenna that we put or when the distance of the last antenna that we put from the easternmost house is smaller than $k$.
  3. If the easternmost house is more than $5$ meters away from the last antenna that we put, we put an antenna at this house.

Is it correct? (Thinking)

I've looked up the greedy algorithm and I think your approach is correct.
Where did you get the specific $5$ meters though? Shouldn't it be $k$ meters? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
I've looked up the greedy algorithm and I think your approach is correct.
Where did you get the specific $5$ meters though? Shouldn't it be $k$ meters? (Wondering)

Oh yes, that's a typo... I meant $k$... (Nerd)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K