Orbit Question - Perigee/Apogee Altitudes

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreenLRan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the new perigee and apogee altitudes of a satellite in a circular Earth orbit at 400 km altitude after a radial velocity boost of 240 m/s. The final calculated values are Z_apogee = 621 km and Z_perigee = 196 km. Key equations utilized include the specific energy equation and the relationship between semi-major axis, eccentricity, and specific angular momentum. The calculations confirm that the orbit remains elliptical despite the velocity increase.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of orbital mechanics and satellite dynamics
  • Familiarity with specific energy and angular momentum equations
  • Knowledge of the gravitational parameter (mu) for Earth
  • Ability to perform calculations involving eccentricity and semi-major axis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the specific energy equation in orbital mechanics
  • Learn about the effects of velocity changes on satellite orbits
  • Explore the concepts of perigee and apogee in elliptical orbits
  • Investigate the implications of orbital eccentricity on satellite trajectories
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, astrophysicists, and students studying orbital mechanics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those involved in satellite trajectory analysis and mission planning.

GreenLRan
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Orbit Question

Homework Statement



A satellite is in a circular Earth orbit of altitude 400km. Determine the new perigee and apogee altitudes if the satellite on-board engine gives the satellite a radial (outward) component of velocity of 240m/s.

Answers: Z_apogee = 621km, Z_perigee = 196km

Homework Equations


mu = 398600km^3/sec^2
h (specific angular momentum) = r*v_perpendicular
a = semimajor axis of ellipse
2*a = perigee radius + apogee radius
v^2/2 + mu/r = -mu/(2*a) ( specific energy equation )
e= eccentricity of the orbit
theta = the true anomaly angle ( angle between eccentricity vector and the position vector)
r_perigee = a(1-e)
radius of the Earth = 6378km

r = h^2/mu * (1+e*cos(theta))

V_cir = sqrt(mu/r)


The Attempt at a Solution



I started off by getting the magnitude of the velocity (v_perp^2 + v_radial^2)^.5
then calculated the escape velocity to see if it would be a closed orbit.

I found that it was still an ellipse (i also calculated the specific energy and found that it was negative... thus being an ellipse) from the specific energy i got 'a' ( -mu/(2*a) )
and using rp = a(1-e) = h^2/mu*(1+e)^-1 (at theta = 0 for rp)


however... when i did this I used the same h that i got from the satellite being a circular orbit.. which i am unsure if that was incorrect to do..

finally after solving for e, i plugged it back into rp = a(1-e) to get ~ 6543km... then the altitude zp = 6543- 6378 = 165km.. which is incorrect... can anyone help?? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The eqn for r in a central force is given by:

½ mr’^2 + L^2/[2m(r^2)] + V = E,

where E is total energy, L is the ang mom, m is the mass of the body and V=PE. In this case, V= -GMm/r = -k/r.

In the 1st case, r=R is const. Because it’s a bound orbit, the total energy is, say, -E1, where E1 is +ve. Since r’=0, we can find the relationship between L, R etc from,

L^2/[2m(R^2)] – k/R = -E1. --(1)

Next, energy E is added to the body’s energy, but the L remains the same, since the impulse was in the direction of r. (E = ½ m*240^2 units.) The total energy is –E2. Then,

½ mr’^2 + L^2/[2m(r^2)] + V = -E2, where –E1+E= -E2, =>

½ mr’^2 = -E2 + k/r - L^2/[2m(r^2)] --(2).

At the apogee or the perigee, r’=0, from which you get the two reqd values of r. You can also show that r must lie between the two roots, showing that the orbit is bounded.
 
Thanks shooting star
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K