Orientability of Submanifolds: A Proof and Strategy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Canavar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orientation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the orientability of submanifolds, specifically proving that a submanifold N of codimension 1 in an orientable manifold M is orientable if and only if there exists a smooth vector field X on M such that the span of X at any point p in N combined with the tangent space T_p N equals the tangent space T_p M. Key definitions of orientability are provided, including the existence of a non-vanishing differential m-form and the use of volume forms. Recommended literature includes Michael Spivak's "A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry" and John Lee's "Introduction to Smooth Manifolds."

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of smooth manifolds and vector fields
  • Familiarity with differential forms and volume forms
  • Knowledge of Riemannian metrics and their applications
  • Basic concepts of codimension in manifold theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of smooth vector fields on manifolds
  • Learn about differential forms and their role in manifold theory
  • Explore Riemannian metrics and their applications in geometry
  • Read Michael Spivak's "A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry" for foundational concepts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, differential geometers, and students studying manifold theory, particularly those interested in the properties of orientability in submanifolds.

Canavar
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello,

here is my exercise:
Let M be a orientable manifold of dimension m and let N be a submanifold of M of codimension 1.
Show that N is orientable <=> it exists aX \in \tau_1 (M), s.t. span&lt;X(p)&gt; \oplus T_p N= T_p M \;<br /> \forall p\in N


The X is a vector field, i.e. X(p) is an tangent vector at p.
But what is the strategy to proof this claim? Excuse me but, I'm so desperate. This stuff is completely new for me and i don't know how this works.

Can you please help me by this proof? Or do you know at least good literature, where i can read something about this topic?

Thanks

Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Notation in this subject varies widely. What is \tau_1(M)? Do you mean to say that X is a smooth vector field on M? (that's what I guess from the problem)

Also, what are you using for a definition of 'orientable'? There are many ways to approach the definition.
 
Hello,

yes you are right, X is a smooth vector field on M.

We have a few equivalent definitions of "orientable".

A manifold is orientable if

1) det d(f \circ g^{-1})&gt;0 , \forall f,g whereas f, g are coordinate maps of the manifold.

<=>2) we have a non-vanishing differential m-form (if dimM=m)

<=>\Lambda^m T^{*}M-\{0\} has two components
 
Suppose \omega is a volume form on M (that is, a nowhere zero m-form). Think about how you can use \omega to convert a vector field X which is everywhere linearly independent from TN, into either a volume form for N or a smooth frame field for N. (By "frame field" I mean a family of m - 1 vector fields in N which are everywhere linearly independent.)

In order to flip between vector fields and forms, it may help you to construct a Riemannian metric on M.

The best exposition I know of basic material about manifolds is Volume I of Michael Spivak, A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry. I've seen other people say good things about John Lee, Introduction to smooth manifolds, but I've never read it.
 
Thank you for your help.

Let \omega be our volume form. , \omega :M-&gt;\Lambda^m M That is \omega assigns to each point a alternating tensor.
And we need a smooth vector field X:M->TM.

But i don't know how \omega induces a vector field.

\omega(p) \in \Lambda^m (T_p M) This is a tensor in this space. Can you please give me another hint?

(excuse me, but this stuff is completely new for me)

Regards
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K