Orientation preserving reparameterization

  • Thread starter chaotixmonjuish
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Orientation
In summary, the conversation is about a problem in O'Neil's differential geometry book. The problem involves proving that any curve that does not pass through the origin can be reparameterized in polar form, where r(t) is equal to the magnitude of the curve. The hint provided references an older problem and asks for assistance in starting the proof. The conversation also mentions denoting f and g as U_1 and U_2, respectively, and the confusion in determining the next steps.
  • #1
chaotixmonjuish
287
0
This is from O'Neil's differential geometry. I'm having trouble parsing through the problem/hint.

Given any curve a that does not pass through the origin has an orientation-preserving reparameterization in the polar form:

a(t) = (r(t)*Cos(V(t)),r(r)*Sin(V(t)))

where r(t)= ||a(t)||

The hint has us reference an older problem. I was wondering if someone could give me a push on how to start proving this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Its just switching to polar form with r(t)= sqrt(x^2 + y^2).
 
  • #3
http://tinypic.com/r/xqf446/7
^^This is the hint I mentioned.

http://tinypic.com/r/24101at/7
^^This is the problem its referencing.

I'm having trouble figuring out what it wants me to do for part (a).

When it mentions denoting a f and g as follows:

f = U_1.(a/||a||) = (1,0).(a/||a||) = Cos(V(t))
g = U_2.(a/||a||) = ... = Sin(V(t))

I'm not sure where I should go after that.
 

FAQ: Orientation preserving reparameterization

What is "orientation preserving reparameterization"?

"Orientation preserving reparameterization" is a mathematical concept used in differential geometry and topology. It refers to the process of transforming a curve or surface in such a way that it preserves the orientation or direction of the curve/surface. This means that the new curve/surface will still have the same "starting point" and "direction" as the original one.

Why is "orientation preserving reparameterization" important?

"Orientation preserving reparameterization" is important because it allows us to study curves and surfaces in a consistent and standardized way. By preserving the orientation of a curve/surface, we can compare different geometric properties (such as curvature) between them and make meaningful conclusions.

How is "orientation preserving reparameterization" different from "reparameterization"?

The main difference between "orientation preserving reparameterization" and "reparameterization" is that the former preserves the orientation/direction of the curve/surface, while the latter does not. Reparameterization can change the "starting point" and "direction" of a curve/surface, while orientation preserving reparameterization cannot.

Can any curve/surface be reparameterized in an orientation preserving way?

No, not all curves/surfaces can be reparameterized in an orientation preserving way. In order for a curve/surface to be reparameterized in this manner, it must be "regular", meaning that it has a well-defined direction and curvature at all points. If the curve/surface is "singular" (such as a point or a line), it cannot be reparameterized in an orientation preserving way.

What are some real-world applications of "orientation preserving reparameterization"?

"Orientation preserving reparameterization" has various real-world applications in fields such as computer graphics, computer-aided design, and robotics. It is commonly used to represent and manipulate 3D objects, such as curves and surfaces, in a consistent and efficient manner. It is also used in computer vision, motion planning, and simulation to analyze and model complex shapes and movements.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
484
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
738
Back
Top