If every tangent line of a curve passes through a point, it is a line

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical concept that if every tangent line of a curve with unit speed parametrization passes through a fixed point, then the curve must be a line. Participants explore various approaches to prove or understand this assertion, including hints from a textbook and personal insights into the implications of the conditions given.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that if every tangent line of a curve B(s) passes through a fixed point P, then B(s) must be a line, referencing a hint from a textbook involving the equation p = B(s) + r(s)B'(s).
  • One participant differentiates the equation p = B(s) + r(s)B'(s) and arrives at conditions involving B'(s) and B''(s), leading to the conclusion that if |B''(s)| = 0, then B(s) must be a line.
  • Another participant suggests using the concept of a cone formed by lines from two points on the curve to the fixed point P, arguing that the entire curve must lie within this cone.
  • Concerns are raised about the case when r(s) is zero for only some values of s, questioning how to rigorously justify that all tangent lines must be parallel in this scenario.
  • One participant proposes using the Frenet-Serret frames to conclude that the curvature of the curve is identically zero, although they acknowledge the need for a contradiction to support this claim.
  • Counterexamples are mentioned regarding characteristic p algebraic geometry, specifically referencing "strange curves" that may not conform to the discussed properties.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints and approaches, with no clear consensus reached. Some agree on the implications of the tangent lines passing through a fixed point, while others introduce counterexamples and alternative considerations that challenge the initial assertion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations of their arguments, particularly regarding the assumptions made about the behavior of r(s) and the implications of curvature in the context of Frenet-Serret frames. The discussion also touches on the complexities introduced by counterexamples in different mathematical contexts.

demonelite123
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
If every tangent line of some curve B(s) which has the unit speed parametrization passes through a fixed point P, then the curve B(s) must be a line.

As a hint, my book says p = B(s) + r(s)B'(s) where r(s) is some function.

so i have that any tangent line L(t) = B(s) + t B'(s) and for some t, L(t) = p = B(s) + r(s)B'(s). i am having trouble continuing with this problem. i cannot think of anything else to do. could someone give me a hint or two on how to proceed? thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
demonelite123 said:
If every tangent line of some curve B(s) which has the unit speed parametrization passes through a fixed point P, then the curve B(s) must be a line.

As a hint, my book says p = B(s) + r(s)B'(s) where r(s) is some function.

so i have that any tangent line L(t) = B(s) + t B'(s) and for some t, L(t) = p = B(s) + r(s)B'(s). i am having trouble continuing with this problem. i cannot think of anything else to do. could someone give me a hint or two on how to proceed? thanks!

Here are two ideas.

- To use your equation recall that the acceleration of a unit speed curve must be perpendicular to the curve.

- Pick two points on the curve and draw the two lines from these two points to the fixed point,p. These lines are tangent to the curve and form a cone. Show that the entire curve must lie inside this cone.
 
Last edited:
hi, using your suggestion i differentiated the equation p = B(s) + r(s)B'(s) on both sides to get:
0 = B'(s) + r'(s)B'(s) + r(s)B''(s) and since |B'(s)| = 1, B'(s) * B''(s) = 0 so i take the dot product of B''(s) on both sides to get: 0 = r(s)|B''(s)|2. now if r(s) is equal to 0 for all s, then it is the trivial case of a line p + sv where v = 0. if r(s) is not equal to 0 for any s then i can divide both sides by it and i end up with |B''(s)| = 0 which means B''(s) is the zero vector or that B'(s) is a constant and that B(s) = p + sv where v = B'(s).

the only trouble I'm having is the case when r(s) is 0 for only some values of s. Then p must be some point on the curve itself. I argue that in order for every tangent line to pass through p, they must all be parallel to the tangent line that passes through p itself. however this is more of an intuitive thought and i don't really have a rigorous justification for it. what can be used to prove the statement in this case when r(s) is 0 for only some values of s?
 
I think you can also use the Frenet-Serret frames to conclude that the curvature of the
curve is identically zero. May be a good idea to translate/shift the curve so that it goes
thru the origin.

EDIT: I know that to use Frenet-Serret frames we need to have non-trivial curvature;
the idea was to get a contradiction by assuming we have a curve with non-trivial torsion
and curvature (a line having both equal to zero), and then arriving at a contradiction, but
I have not been able to get much from this yet; I'll try for a while longer.
 
Last edited:
for a counter example in characteristic p algebraic geometry google "strange curves".
 
mathwonk said:
for a counter example in characteristic p algebraic geometry google "strange curves".

i.e. in characteristic 2, a conic can have concurrent tangents.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K