Origin of Modern Domesticated Horses Found

  • Thread starter Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Origin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Genomic analysis of ancient horse DNA has pinpointed the western Eurasian steppe as the origin of modern domesticated horses, with significant domestication events occurring around 5,500 years ago by the Botai culture (DOM1) and 4,200 years ago (DOM2). The study reveals that the first domesticated horses lacked specific mutations related to anxiety and aggression, which are present in modern horses and may have facilitated their domestication. Additionally, the discussion highlights the challenges of domesticating zebras due to their aggressive nature, contrasting them with the more manageable domesticated horse lineage.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of genomic analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of equine history and domestication processes
  • Familiarity with the Botai culture and its significance in horse domestication
  • Awareness of genetic mutations related to animal behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the genomic analysis methods used in ancient DNA studies
  • Explore the cultural practices of the Botai people and their role in early horse domestication
  • Investigate the genetic mutations associated with animal domestication, focusing on anxiety and aggression
  • Study the behavioral traits of zebras and the implications for domestication efforts
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in genetics, historians of animal domestication, equine behavior specialists, and anyone interested in the evolutionary history of horses.

BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,739
Reaction score
11,973
Using genomics on DNA collected from ancient horses that lived between 2,000 and 10,000 years ago, scientists have identified an area in western Eurasian steppe where the predecessors of modern horses came from.
Science mag News article here.
Screen Shot 2021-10-20 at 2.00.04 PM.png


This is the second domestication of horses (DOM2) at about 4,200 years ago. The first domestication (DOM1), by the Botai, occurred further east, at about 5,500 years ago. Although there is evidence of the earlier horses having had bits in their mouths (from teeth ware), these are not the noble steeds of today's cowboys. Genetically, they are closely related to Przewalski's horse, a different species of now endangered wild horses. Its hypothesized that they were mostly herded for food and milk.

Genomic analysis indicates that two mutations might have been useful in their domestication. One is involved in controlling anxiety and aggression and the other maybe involved in having stronger backs.
The DOM1 animals did not have these mutations, and thus did not prosper in domestication.
Along similar lines, one might wonder why zebras were not domesticated, since they undoubtedly have a very long human adjacent history. Zebras have a reputation of being really nasty animals to try to handle. Very aggressive, with a reputation for biting and not letting go.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BWV, jedishrfu, pinball1970 and 4 others
Biology news on Phys.org
Bottom line, they are Russian which explains why they run so fast as they’re rushin around.
 
May be out of date now, but enjoyed this book and it discussed some of the issues - the transition from horses as dairy / meat animals to riding. The Botai culture were not thought to be PIE (proto-Indoeuropean) speakers, as were the Yamnaya

417UKyEfy3L._SX327_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and jedishrfu
Ware is pottery, wear is erosion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
And weather or not where is here, there, everywhere or know where?
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
I had guessed zebras were not domesticated because they fall apart under stress.
200420-zebra.jpg
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
When I was a lot younger I had a book entitled something like 'Horses, how they came to be'. I'm sure it's around yet and I'm sure I can find it. If anyone here followed a post of mine from previously in the day you'll find something else I hung onto from my youth. Lol. You'll probably get the idea I don't toss much. Anyway, my point is that I'm wondering if the book from 40 to 45 years ago agrees with what we know today.