I've been reading QM by Landau Lifgarbagez, in which I've come across a statement I can't seem to get my head around.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

It states (just before equation 3.6):

a_n = SUM a_m. INTEGRAL f_m. f_n. dq

( a_n is the nth coefficient, f_m is the mth eigenfunction of an operator, dq is the differential element.

It follows from the equation for determining the coefficients in a wavefunction composed of a linear sum of eigenfunctions of an operator:

a_n = INTEGRAL f_n. f. dq )

It then states that it is evident from this that the eigenfunctions must be orthogonal. I don't see how this is? I would like to understand this, as it would imply that orthogonality of eigenfunctions would fall directly out of the mathematics of QM!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Orthogonal Eigenfunctions (Landau Lifshitz)

Loading...

Similar Threads - Orthogonal Eigenfunctions Landau | Date |
---|---|

I Why does a quantum system with many degrees of freedom imply orthogonality? | Jan 21, 2018 |

Eigenfunctions orthogonal in Hilbert space | Mar 3, 2015 |

Do the eigenfunctions for the position operator form an orthogonal set? | Nov 1, 2011 |

Question on orthogonal eigenfunctions | Jun 15, 2010 |

Orthogonal Eigenfunctions | Jun 22, 2004 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**