Orthogonal eigenvectors and Green functions

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the diagonalization of a Hermitian operator (Hamiltonian) that features both discrete and continuous spectra. It addresses whether eigenvectors corresponding to these spectra are mutually orthogonal, with the initial assumption being affirmative. However, a numerical calculation initially suggested a non-zero inner product between the eigenvectors, raising doubts. Upon further analysis, it was determined that the inner product is indeed zero when calculated analytically, confirming the orthogonality. The confusion stemmed from an error in the numerical computation.
paolorossi
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi you all. I have to diagonalize a hermitian operator (hamiltonian), that has both discrete and continuous spectrum. If ψ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue in the continuous spectrum, and χ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue in the discrete spectrum, is correct to say that ψ and χ are always mutually orthogonal? I think the answer is yes. But if I numerically calculate the inner product between ψ and χ, then I find that this is far from zero.

PS
I work in this way.
I calculate the eigenvalues and eigenvectors from the Green operator.
Specifically, I have the hamiltonian operator

H = H0 + V

H0 has only continuous spectrum. Using a perturbative expansion, I find the Green operator

G(z) = 1/(z-H)

in terms of V and of the Green operator of H0

G0(z) = 1/(z-H0)

So I find that G(z) has a branch cut and one simple pole. This is consistent with various works and books. Then I calculate the eigenvalues and the corrispondent eigenvectors. So I express ψ and χ in terms of a common basis, and using the Fourier coefficients I can calculate the inner product.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok I solve it. I have calculated analytically the inner product and I see that it is zero. In fact, I had made ​​a mistake in the numerical calculation.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K