Orthogonal Lines and their line element

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of line elements in the context of orthogonal lines on a sphere, as introduced in Hartle's "Gravity." It explores whether the distance between points on two orthogonal lines can be expressed using a Pythagorean-like equation. The conversation delves into the mathematical formulation of distances on a spherical surface using spherical coordinates, highlighting the derivation of the line element through quadratic forms. The absence of mixed terms in the distance equation indicates that the coordinate curves are orthogonal. Overall, the discussion confirms the validity of representing distances in this manner on a spherical surface.
Vorde
Messages
786
Reaction score
0
In one of the early chapters of Gravity by Hartle, he is developing the line element on a sphere in preparation for developing the concept of a spacetime interval. Whilst finishing up the proof Hartle sort of implicitly says that if two lines are orthogonal the line element connecting two points on the two lines can be given by a pythagorean-like equation (the distance)2=(position on one line)2+(position on the other)2.

Is the more general question of a line element being the sum of the squares of the two orthogonal lines true?

Sorry if this question is a bit messy.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In general, if you have a "surface" or "space" with a coordinate system with coordinates x^1, x^2, ..., x^n, then the distance is given by a quadratic form \sum a_{ij}dx^idx^j.

Is that what you are talking about?
cgv
In particular, on the surface of a sphere of radius, R, we can identify each point by using spherical coordinates with the radial coordinate, \rho, fixed as the constant, R.

x= Rcos(\theta)sin(\phi) so that dx= -Rsin(\theta)sin(\phi)d\theta+ Rcos(\theta)cos(\phi)d\phi
y= Rsin(\theta)sin(\phi) so that dy= Rcos(\theta)sin(\phi)d\theta+ Rsin(\theta)cos(\phi)d\phi
z= R cos(\phi) so that dz= -R sin(\phi)d\phi

And now,
dx^2= R^2cos^2(\theta)sin^2(\phi)d\theta^2- 2R^2sin(\theta)cos(theta)sin(\phi)cos(\phi)d\theta d\phi+ R^2cos^2(\theta)cos^2(\phi)d\phi^2
dy^2= R^2sin^2(\theta)sin^2(\phi)d\theta^2+ 2R^2 sin(\theta)cos(\theta)sin(\phi)cos(\phi)d\theta d\phi+ R^2sin^2(\theta)cos^2(\phi)d\phi^2
so that dx^2+ dy^2= R^2sin^2(\phi)d\theta^2+ R^2cos^2(\phi)d\phi^2

And dz^2= R^2 sin^2(\phi) d\phi^2 so that dx^2+ dy^2+ dz^2= R^2sin^2(\phi)d\theta^2+ R^2d\phi^2

That can be written as \sum g_{ij}dx^idx^j or, as a matrix product, in this particular coordinate system,
\begin{pmatrix}d\theta & d\phi\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}R^2sin^2(\phi) & 0 \\ 0 & R^2\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}d\theta \\ d\phi\end{pmatrix}

There is no "d\theta d\phi" term, and the matrix is diagonal, precisely because the constant \theta and constant \phi curves are always orthogonal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think I followed that, and I do think that is what I was talking about.

Thank you.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K