Orthogonality in h^n for a field h

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Josh Swanson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Orthogonality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the surjectivity of a linear map f: V -> h^n, where V is a vector space over a field h and n is a positive integer. It establishes that if the only vector orthogonal to every vector f(v) is the zero vector, then f is surjective. The proof leverages the relationship between the dimensions of a subspace and its orthogonal complement, specifically that for any subspace W of h^n, the equation dim(W) + dim(W^⊥) = n holds. The conclusion is that since f(V)^⊥ = {0}, it follows that dim(f(V)) = n, confirming the surjectivity of f.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear maps and vector spaces
  • Familiarity with orthogonality in vector spaces
  • Knowledge of dimension theory in linear algebra
  • Concept of inner product spaces and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear maps in vector spaces
  • Learn about orthogonal complements and their implications in linear algebra
  • Explore the relationship between dimensions of vector spaces and their duals
  • Investigate non-degenerate inner products and their significance in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in linear algebra, theoretical physicists, and students studying vector spaces and their properties will benefit from this discussion.

Josh Swanson
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Let V be a vector space over a field h and let n be a positive integer. Let f:V -> h^n be a linear map given by
f(v) = (f1(v), f2(v), ..., fn(v)). Call two vectors (g1, ..., gn) and (h1, ..., hn) in h^n "orthogonal" if

g1 h1 + ... + gn hn = 0

Suppose the only vector orthogonal to every vector f(v) is the 0 vector. Is f surjective?


Maybe I'm just missing something, but the only way I can see to get the result is to consider the orthogonal complement of the image of f, but that requires the codomain to be an inner product space, which h^n isn't in general. (In fact, in this application, h can be either a field of prime order or the rationals.)

This question was inspired by Andrea Ferretti's http://mathoverflow.net/questions/13322/slick-proof-a-vector-space-has-the-same-dimension-as-its-dual-if-and-only-if-it" that the dimension of an infinite dimensional vector space is less than that of its dual. I'm not convinced the end of the proof works out. Considering orthogonality in basically the situation I've outlined is suggested at the end of the comments by KConrad.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let f(V) be our image. It is proven in www.maths.bris.ac.uk/~maxmr/la2/notes_5.pdf[/URL] that it still holds for every subspace W of [itex]h^n[/itex] that

[tex]\dim{W}+\dim{W^\bot}=n[/tex]

In particular (since [itex]f(V)^\bot=\{0\}[/itex])

[tex]\dim{f(V)}=n[/tex]

so our map is surjective.

EDIT: I should probably say why our "inner product" is non-degenerate, since I can imagine that this is not always the case. It's because [itex]f(V)^\bot=\{0\}[/itex], from which it follows that [itex](h^n)^\bot=\{0\}[/itex]. So the radical is {0}, which is equivalent to non-degeneracy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, wonderful, thanks for the link! I was hoping the result was still true outside of inner product spaces, and so it is. That completes the proof then.


P.S. Non-degeneracy can also be deduced easily without recourse to the existence of f from

(c_1, ..., c_i, ..., c_n) . (0, ..., 0, 1, 0, ..., 0) = c_i
so if c is orthogonal to h^n then
c . e_i = c_i = 0
so c = 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K