Orthogonality on Inner Product (Quantum Mechanics also)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a qubit in a state |v> ∈ ℂ^2 and the conditions under which the probability of obtaining a measurement result of "+1" is zero. The focus is on the relationship between the state |v> and the state |n,+>, specifically regarding their orthogonality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of orthogonality between the states |v> and |n,+> on the measurement probability. Concerns are raised about the strength of the proof provided for one direction of the "if and only if" statement. Suggestions include utilizing the completeness of the basis formed by the states |±n> to strengthen the argument.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the proof's validity and exploring different approaches to clarify the relationship between the states involved. Some guidance has been offered to enhance the proof's rigor, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the notation for inner products, highlighting the distinction between column and row vector representations, which may affect the clarity of the mathematical expressions used in the discussion.

RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


Consider a qubit in the state |v> ∈ ℂ^2. Suppose that a measurement of δn is made on the qubit. Show that the probability of obtaining the result "+1" in the measurement is equal to 0 if and only if |v> and |n,+> are orthogonal.

Homework Equations


Inner product axioms
|v>|w> are orthogonal if |v>|w> = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


First things first, that this is a if and only if proof.
a. Prob(+1) = 0 implies that |v> and |n,+> are orthogonal
b. |v> and |n,+> are orthogonal implies Prob(+1) = 0

Proof of b: Prob(+1) = | |n,+> |v> |^2 , but since |n,+> and |v> are orthogonal as assumed, by definition of orthogonality, this is equal to 0. And so Prob(+1) = 0.

Proof of a: Similarly, Prob(+1) = | |n,+> |v> |^2 and since this equals 0, we see that |n,+>|v> = 0. But this is precisely the definition of orthogonality.

My concern: My concern is mainly with the proof of a, it seems very weak. Would you consider this a proper proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One little bump before the week starts. :)
 
To make the proof less "handwavy", I would start from the fact that ##\left|\pm n \right\rangle## form a complete basis, i.e., one can always write
$$
\left|\psi \right\rangle = a \left| +n \right\rangle + b \left|-n \right\rangle
$$
and deduce things about the values of ##a## and ##b##.

Also, please note that the inner product is noted <v|w>, not |v>|w>. |v> is a column vector, and <v| a row vector.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Thanks for the help here. That's a good idea and may make it a stronger proof.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
923
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K