Orthonormality of Fourier functions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter NanakiXIII
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier Functions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the orthonormality of Fourier functions, particularly in the context of Fourier expansions. The coefficients for the Fourier series, defined as a_0 = (1/2π) ∫_{-π}^{π} f(x) dx, a_n = (1/2π) ∫_{-π}^{π} f(x) 2 cos(nx) dx, and b_n = (1/2π) ∫_{-π}^{π} f(x) 2 sin(nx) dx, do not yield an orthonormal set due to the factor of two in the sine and cosine terms. The inner product definition = (1/2π) ∫_{-π}^{π} f(x) g(x) dx complicates the orthonormality, while the exponential form of the Fourier series maintains orthonormality. Adjusting the inner product to = (1/π) ∫_{-π}^{π} f(x) g(x) dx resolves this issue, allowing for orthonormality among sine and cosine functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier series and expansions
  • Familiarity with inner product spaces
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their properties
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of orthonormal bases in functional analysis
  • Learn about the exponential form of Fourier series and its implications
  • Explore the concept of inner products in Hilbert spaces
  • Investigate the role of normalization in function spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers interested in signal processing, harmonic analysis, and the theoretical foundations of Fourier analysis.

NanakiXIII
Messages
391
Reaction score
0
Looking at a Fourier expansion,

[tex]f(x) = a_0 + a_1 \cos{x} + b_1 \sin{x} + a_2 \cos{2 x} + b_2 \sin{2 x} + ...[/tex],

I would expect the coefficients to be the projections of [tex]f(x)[/tex] on the different Fourier functions, which should form an orthonormal basis. This doesn't seem to be the case, though. The formulae for the coefficients say

[tex]a_0 = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(x) 1 dx[/tex];

[tex]a_n = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(x) 2 \cos{n x} dx[/tex];

[tex]b_n = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(x) 2 \sin{n x} dx[/tex].

Now, assuming that the inner product is defined as

[tex]<f,g> = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(x) g(x) dx[/tex],

these coefficients are not simply the projections, since the sines and cosines get a factor two. Further more, these sines and cosines do not form an orthonormal set. So what exactly is going on? Are my assumptions about the nature of the coefficients or about the expected orthonormality of the functions wrong?

I also noticed that if you use the exponential form of the Fourier series, all the functions are perfectly orthonormal and the coefficients are indeed the projections on these functions. Perhaps something happens when changing from exponential form to sine and cosine form?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So Redefine the inner product to be:

[tex]<f,g>=\frac{1}{\pi}\int^{\pi}_{-\pi}f(x)g(x)dx[/tex]

And then the sines and cosines will be orthonormal to each other ( the constant function will need refactoring, it's the only function that doesn't blend nicely into the set).

Convention gives the next sum:

[tex]f(x) -> \frac{a_{0}}{2}+\sum^{\infty}_{n=1}a_{n}cos(nx)+b_{n}sin(nx)[/tex]

Where

[tex]a_{0}=\frac{1}{\pi}\int^{\pi}_{-\pi}f(x)dx[/tex]
[tex]a_{n}=\frac{1}{\pi}\int^{\pi}_{-\pi}f(x)cos(nx)dx[/tex]
[tex]b_{n}=\frac{1}{\pi}\int^{\pi}_{-\pi}f(x)sin(nx)dx[/tex]I must add that dealing with orthonormallity is quite artificial. You can always normalize every function given an inner product (assuming of course, it is of the integral form). The center of the Fourier Series (and Sturm-Liouville comes in too) Theorem is the orthogonality.

P.S. About your last paragraph regarding the exponential basis. Yes, there is this 1/2 factor when considering Euler's Identities:

[tex]sin(x)=\frac{1}{2i}(e^{ix}-e^{-ix})[/tex]
[tex]cos(x)=\frac{1}{2}(e^{ix}+e^{-ix})[/tex]

Perhaps this is what causes the orthonormality of the exponentials with the 1/(2pi) inner product.
 
I hadn't though of it. You can of course absorb a factor 2 into [tex]a_0[/tex] to make your functions orthonormal. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K