Oscillation of a closed subinterval

  • Thread starter Thread starter chaotixmonjuish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed Oscillation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 1K views
chaotixmonjuish
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
Given [itex]\epsilon > 0[/itex], suppose [itex]\omega_f(x) < \epsilon[/itex] for each [itex]x \in [a,b][/itex]. Then show there is [itex]\delta > 0[/itex] such that for every closed interval [itex]I \in [a,b][/itex] with [itex]l(I)< \delta[/itex] we have [itex]\omega_f(I) < \epsilon[/itex].

My first approach to this was trying to think of it as an anaglous to the definition of continuity. However, it would appear, at least to me, that we are talking about a "uniformly" oscillating interval. I'm just not sure how to prove this. My first idea was simply, since I know that things are [itex]\epsilon[/itex] spaced, I could always pick intervals small enough. I'm not sure how to do this rigorously.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing you will need to do is define "[itex]\omega_f(x)[/itex]" and "[itex]\omega_f(I)[/itex]". They are, of course, the "oscillation" of f at x and on interval I, but what are the precise definitions?
 
The definitions of oscillation of a set and point respectively:

[itex]\omega_f(A)=\sup\limits_{x,y\in A}f(x)-f(y)|[/itex]

[itex]\omega_f(x)=\inf\{\omega_f(x)=\inf\{\omega_f(x-\epsilon, x+\epsilon)\cap A) : \epsilon > 0\}[/itex]