Can You Use Non-Pivot Rows to Scale a Matrix?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Metame
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Scale
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the use of non-pivot rows in the Gauss algorithm for scaling matrices. The original poster argues that they can successfully scale a matrix using any row, not just the pivot row, and have achieved correct solutions through this method. They provide an example demonstrating their approach, which contrasts with their teacher's insistence on only using the pivot line for nullifying other column entries. The poster seeks clarification on why their method is deemed incorrect despite yielding accurate results. The conversation highlights a debate on the flexibility of row operations in matrix manipulation.
Metame
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, here's my problem : I was introduced the Gauss algorithm used to scale a matrix (to obtain a triangular matrix in order to solve a system of equations), but my teacher says that we can only use the pivot line to null the rest of the numbers of the column.

The fact is I have done quite a lot of exercises where I have to scale a matrix, but I don't necessaryly null with the pivot line, but any line (and often, by doing the right operations, I save a lot lot of time). She says I can't do that, even if I have the right solutions, and I don't see why. So why? I'm trying to demonstrate I can.

(Here's a very simple example to show what I'm talking about:

We have the matrix :
2 1 0 1 L1 first pivot line here
-1 2 0 1 L2
1 0 1 1 L3

Following carefully the Gauss algorithm :
2 1 0 1 L1
0 5 0 3 L2'=2*L2+L1 (forced to use L1, the pivot line)
0 -1 2 1 L3'=2*L3-L1 (forced to use L1 too)

Then L2' is the new pivot line, so I must do :
2 1 0 1 L1
0 5 0 3 L2
0 0 10 8 L3''=5*L3'+L2 (forced to use L2, pivot line)

and I have S={(1/5,3/5,4/5)})
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If I remember correctly, the "pivot" is the largest number on the diagonal. You don't have to use that but, under some circumstances, using the largest number will increase the accuracy.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K