P-Chart: Diff. btwn lot & sample size

  • Thread starter Thread starter axnman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sample size
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating a P-chart for a process producing rubber belts in lots of 2,500 units. The user seeks clarification on determining the sample size ("n") for calculating control limits, questioning whether to use the lot size of 2,500. It is established that without knowing the actual sample size from which the defectives are drawn, accurate P-chart calculations cannot be performed. The importance of understanding both the number of defectives and the corresponding sample size is emphasized for effective quality control analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of P-chart methodology
  • Knowledge of statistical process control (SPC)
  • Familiarity with defect rate calculations
  • Basic concepts of lot size and sample size in quality control
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate control limits for P-charts
  • Study the implications of sample size on defect rate analysis
  • Explore statistical process control tools like Minitab for P-chart analysis
  • Investigate the relationship between lot size and sampling methods in quality assurance
USEFUL FOR

Quality control analysts, process engineers, and anyone involved in manufacturing and inspection processes seeking to enhance their understanding of P-charts and defect analysis.

axnman
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi

need some clearance of idea:

A process produces rubber belts in lots of sizes 2,500. Inspection records on
the last 20 lots reveal the following data:

then u have data in the format:

Lot Number non-conforming belts
1 230
2 235
etc etc etc etc
20 207

need to calculate p-chart for it...so have p-bar = tot. defective/2500*20...right?

what would I use as "n" to calculate the control limits? n is sample size so should it be 2500(lot-size here?).

Would appreciate if anyone could clear it out for me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If all you have is what you have given here is all you have, you don't have enough information. In particular, knowing that there were 230 defectives in the sample tells you nothing if you don't know the size of the sample. 230 defectives out of a sample of 2500 might not be too bad but 230 defectives out of a sample of 230 surely is! Are you not told how large each sample is?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K