MHB Parabola standard form of equation at x = -1

Joystar77
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Find the standard form of the equation of the parabola with the given characteristics and vertex at the origin. Passes through the point (-1, 1/8); vertical axis.

I know that there is no focus of the parabola or equation given for this problem, so how would I solve this problem? Is the correct formula to use the following?:

x^2= 4py

Are these the correct steps to take?

1. Write original equation

2. Divide each side by number given.

3. Write in standard form.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
re: Parabola standard form of equation at x=-1

I have two different formulas for using the conic section of a parabola, can someone please tell me which is correct for this type of problem?

The first one is as follows:
Type: Parabola
General Equation: y = a (x-h)^2 + k
Standard Form: (x - h) ^2 = 4p (y-k)

Notation:
1. x2 term and y1 term.
2. (h,k) is vertex.
3. (h, k does not equal p) is center of focus, where p = 1/4a.
4. y =k does not equal p is directrix equation, where p = 1/4a.

Value:
1. a >0, then opens up.
2. a < 0, then opens down.
3. x = h is equation of line of symmetry.
4. Larger [a] = thinner parabola; smaller [a] = fatter parabola.

Type: Parabola
General Equation: x = a (y-k)^2 + h
Standard Form: (y-k)^2 = 4p(x-h)

Notation:
1. x1 term and y2 term.
2. (h,k) is vertex.
3. (h does not equal p, k) is focus, where p = 1/4a.
4. x = h does not equal p is directrix equation, where p = 1/4a.

Values:

1. a > 0, then opens right.
2. a < 0, then opens left.
3. y = k is equation of line of symmetry.

In this problem, find the standard form of the equation of the parabola with the given characteristics and vertex at the origin. Passes through the point (-1, 1/8); vertical axis. Would this problem be correct if I work it out this way?

Vertex is at (0,0), then is the equation y = ax^2?

1/8 = a(-1)^2

a = 1/8

y = (1/8)x^2

STANDARD FORM:

y = (1/8) x^2

8y = x^2

x^2 - 8y = 0

Is this the correct way to solve this problem? Which formula am I suppose to use? If this is not right, then can somebody please help me with this?
 
Re: Parabola standard form of equation at x=-1

Except for the fact that you have the parabola going through a point with x= -1 instead of x= -5, this is exactly the same as your post "Parabola standard form of equation at x= -4" and every answer there applies to this.

You ask "which of these formulas is correct for this type of problem
General Equation: y = a (x-h)^2 + k
Standard Form: (x - h) ^2 = 4p (y-k)"

The answer is that they are the same formula except that the "a" in one is "1/4p" where p is from the other.

In both problems, the "vertex is at the origin" so h= k= 0 and the two equations become
General Equation: y = ax^2
Standard Form: x^2 = 4py
and, again, they are the same with a= 1/4p. Here, you are told that the graph goes through the point (-1, 1/8) so put x= -1, y= 1/8 into either and solve for a or p, as appropriate.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top