Parabolas and hyperbolas - how do you find them?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter The_ArtofScience
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    hyperbolas
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding equations for parabolas and hyperbolas given specific points. Participants explore the general form of conic sections and the conditions necessary to determine their equations based on initial coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their familiarity with linear equations and expresses uncertainty about finding equations for parabolas and hyperbolas given two points.
  • Another participant presents the general form of conic sections and states that five points are needed to define a curve uniquely.
  • A participant questions the applicability of the general equation, suggesting that conic sections do not have a defined slope and expresses a belief that a parabolic equation can be determined from two sets of coordinates.
  • Another participant explains how to derive equations from five points by substituting coordinates into the general equation, leading to a system of equations that can be solved for the parameters.
  • This participant provides a worked example, solving the system and obtaining specific values for the parameters, resulting in an equation that resembles a hyperbola.
  • One participant expresses appreciation for the example provided, acknowledging the complexity involved.
  • A later reply challenges the idea that two points are sufficient to define a parabola, providing counterexamples of different parabolas that pass through the same two points.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the sufficiency of two points to define a parabola, with some asserting that more points are necessary while others believe it is possible under certain conditions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the conditions needed to uniquely determine a parabolic equation.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need for multiple points to define conic sections, but the exact conditions and assumptions regarding the nature of the curves remain unclear. The discussion also highlights the complexity of solving systems of equations derived from conic sections.

The_ArtofScience
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Finding linear equations for initial conditions has never been a problem from me since is easy to see (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) can be plugged into the slope equation. But what if I'm looking for a parabolic or even a hyperbolic line, how do I then find its equation with the initial condition that it must have some (x,y) and (x2, y2) points?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The general form for conic sections (parabolas, hyperbolas, ellipses, circles, two lines) looks like ax2+bxy+cy2+mx+ny+k=0. Since you can divide by any constant, there are five parameters. Therefore you need to specify the curve at five points.
 
Well, given that I still don't see a way to make sense out of that general equation since conic secs don't have an actual slope (unless one were to find its many tangents). I'm convinced that there is a way to solve for a parabolic equation given two sets of coordinates though
 
You plug the coordinates into the equation for each of the 5 points. That gives you 5 equations and 5 unknowns, which you can solve for.

Eg: suppose the curve passes through the following points (im just making these points up):
(1,2); (0,0); (3,4); (-1,3); (-2,-3).

Plugging each point into the equation
[tex]x^2+b \cdot x \cdot y+c \cdot y^2+m \cdot x+n \cdot y+k=0[/tex],

you get the following 5 equations:
[tex]1^2+b \cdot 1 \cdot 2+c \cdot 2^2+m \cdot 1+n \cdot 2+k=0[/tex]
[tex]0^2+b \cdot 0 \cdot 0+c \cdot 0^2+m \cdot 0+n \cdot 0+k=0[/tex]
[tex]3^2+b \cdot 3 \cdot 4+c \cdot 4^2+m \cdot 3+n \cdot 4+k=0[/tex]
[tex](-1)^2+b \cdot (-1) \cdot 3+c \cdot 3^2+m \cdot (-1)+n \cdot 3+k=0[/tex]
[tex](-2)^2+b \cdot (-2) \cdot (-3)+c \cdot (-3)^2+m \cdot (-2)+n \cdot (-3)+k=0[/tex]

Simplifying,
[tex]1+2 b+4 c+m +2 n+k=0[/tex]
[tex]k=0[/tex]
[tex]9+12 b+16 c+3 m+4 n+k=0[/tex]
[tex]1-3 b +9 c-1 m+3 n+k=0[/tex]
[tex]4+6 b+9 c-2 m-3 n+k=0[/tex]

Now you can solve these equations for b,c,m,n, and k.

----

I went ahead and solved this system of equations since it isn't much trouble, and got the following answers:
b = 116/33
c = -95/33
m = -133/11
n = 257/33
k = 0

So,
[tex]x^2+\frac{116}{33}x \cdot y-\frac{95}{33} y^2-\frac{133}{11} x+\frac{257}{33} y=0[/tex]

Plotting the resulting figure, it looks like a hyperbola, and it passes through all the points we want. Whew!
http://img520.imageshack.us/img520/8662/hyperbolapl5.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry that you had to go through all that trouble maze. Thanks for the example
 
The_ArtofScience said:
Well, given that I still don't see a way to make sense out of that general equation since conic secs don't have an actual slope (unless one were to find its many tangents). I'm convinced that there is a way to solve for a parabolic equation given two sets of coordinates though
Then you are convinced wrong. y= x2 and y= 2x2- 1
both pass through the two points (1, 1) and (-1, 1).

Even given the information that the graph is a parabola, concave upward, with vertical axis, the two points (1, 1) and (-1, 1) are not enough to define a specific parabola.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K