Parallel-plate capacitor question

  • Thread starter Thread starter conniechiwa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a parallel-plate capacitor constructed from aluminum foil sheets, with specific dimensions and a potential difference applied. The original poster attempts to calculate the charge on the capacitor plates after determining the capacitance using the formula C = E0A/d.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of capacitance and the subsequent determination of charge using the equation Q=CV. There are questions regarding the accuracy of the capacitance value and the application of units in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the calculations, noting discrepancies in the capacitance value and the units used for charge. There is an acknowledgment of a potential typo in the original capacitance calculation, and one participant expresses that they have resolved their confusion regarding the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is an emphasis on ensuring correct unit conversions and understanding the relationships between the quantities involved.

conniechiwa
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
A parallel-plate capacitor is made from two aluminum foil sheets, each 5 cm long and 5.1 cm wide. The two sheets are separated by a distance of 0.02 mm. If a potential difference of 3 volts is applied across the two plates of this capacitor, what is the absolute value of the charge on the plate with the higher voltage? What is the absolute value of the charge on the plate with the lower voltage?

I have already found the capacitance by using C = E0A/d. I got an answer of C = 1.28E-9 F. I tried using the equation Q=CV in order to find the value of the charge on the plates, but I still can't get the right answer. Help please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What's the right answer?
 


Hi conniechiwa,

conniechiwa said:
A parallel-plate capacitor is made from two aluminum foil sheets, each 5 cm long and 5.1 cm wide. The two sheets are separated by a distance of 0.02 mm. If a potential difference of 3 volts is applied across the two plates of this capacitor, what is the absolute value of the charge on the plate with the higher voltage? What is the absolute value of the charge on the plate with the lower voltage?

I have already found the capacitance by using C = E0A/d. I got an answer of C = 1.28E-9 F. I tried using the equation Q=CV in order to find the value of the charge on the plates, but I still can't get the right answer. Help please!

It's difficult to tell what you did without any details. However, I don't believe the capacitance you calculated is correct. (Perhaps you misread the result on your calculator?) Try it again, and if you don't get the right answer, please post some more details of the numbers you used.
 


The answer I submitted for capacitance was accepted. This is what I did:
Area = (50000 micrometers)(51000 micrometers)
= 2.55E9 micrometers
C=(E0A)/d
=(8.85E-12)(2.55E9 micrometers)/20 micrometers
=1.128E-3 microFarads

To find charge, I did:
q=cv
=(1.128E-3 microFarads)(3E-6 microvolts)
= 3.84E-9 microcoulombs
 
Last edited:


conniechiwa said:
The answer I submitted for capacitance was accepted. This is what I did:
Area = (50000 micrometers)(51000 micrometers)
= 2.55E9 micrometers
C=(E0A)/d
=(8.85E-12)(2.55E9 micrometers)/20 micrometers
=1.128E-3 microFarads


Right; that's what I got for the capacitance. (In your original post you said you got [itex]1.28\times 10^{-9}[/itex] F, instead of the correct [itex]1.128\times 10^{-9}[/itex] F, but maybe that was just a typo in your post?)

To find charge, I did:
q=cv
=(1.128E-3 microFarads)(3E-6 microvolts)
= 3.84E-9 microcoulombs

These numbers don't look right for the voltage. The [itex]3\times 10^{-6}[/itex] microvolts is equal to [itex]3\times 10^{-12}[/itex] volts, which is not right.

Also, for the units, microFarads times microvolts does not give microcoulombs; it would give something like micromicrocoulombs (since there are two "micro"s in the product), which you would definitely have to adjust.

In other words, the units would act like:

(1 microfarad) (1 microvolt) = (1e-6 microcoulomb) = (1e-12 coulomb)
 


Oh okay I figured out what my problem was. Thanks. =)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K