MHB Parallelogram with diagonals. Need to find the area (S).

STS
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
diagonal 1=20cm.
diagonal 2=37cm.
AB=25.5cm

S (AMC)= 306cm.
S (ABCD)=?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
STS said:
diagonal 1=20cm.
diagonal 2=37cm.
AB=25.5cm
Okay, that makes sense.

S (AMC)= 306cm.
S (ABCD)=?
What?? What is "S( )"? What is "M"? Is it another point? The midpoint where the two diagonals intercept?
 

Attachments

  • 333741DD-913B-4F0E-971E-5FF0F2D26C04.jpeg
    333741DD-913B-4F0E-971E-5FF0F2D26C04.jpeg
    11.5 KB · Views: 113
Last edited:
Country Boy said:
Okay, that makes sense.What?? What is "S( )"? What is "M"? Is it another point? The midpoint where the two diagonals intercept?

S is the area. You move one of the diaganals to the side, then that forms a triangle. Then with Heron's formula you figure out the area of the triangle that has formed (AMC). That is suppose to help you figure out the area of the parallelogram using another formula, but I couldn't figure it out.
 
STS said:
S is the area. You move one of the diaganals to the side, then that forms a triangle. Then with Heron's formula you figure out the area of the triangle that has formed (AMC). That is suppose to help you figure out the area of the parallelogram using another formula, but I couldn't figure it out.
OK; then WHY did you post only this:
........
diagonal 1=20cm.
diagonal 2=37cm.
AB=25.5cm

S (AMC)= 306cm.
S (ABCD)=?
........

You're given the 2 diagonals plus 1 side.
That's plenty of info to calculate the area.
S(AMC) = 306 not required...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top