Parametric curve /derivative problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter ParoxysmX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Parametric
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
ParoxysmX
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the parametric curve given by the equation

x(t) = ti + t^(1/3)j1. Calculate x'(t). Does the vector exist at [itex]t=0[/itex]?

2. Find a new parametrisation of the curve for which the tangent vector is well
defined at all points. What is the value of the vector at the origin?

The Attempt at a Solution



For q.1, is it as simple as finding dx/dt? which would be [itex]1 + \frac{1}{3\sqrt[3]{t^{2}}}[/itex]?

As for q.2, I'm completely stumped.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it really is as simple as finding dx/dt. No, what you have is NOT dx/dt. x(t) is a vector and dx/dt is a vector: dx/dt= i+ [itex]\frac{1}{3}t^{-2/3}[/itex]j.

As for (2), [itex]e^s[/itex] exists for all s so try [itex]e^s[/itex]i+ [itex]e^{s/3}[/itex]j.
Do you see why that is also a parameterization for the curve?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, it really is as simple as finding dx/dt. No, what you have is NOT dx/dt. x(t) is a vector and dx/dt is a vector: dx/dt= i+ [itex]\frac{1}{3}t^{-2/3}[/itex]j.

Ah yes, my mistake. So this should mean that dx/dt does not exist at t=0, since [itex]\frac{1}{3}t^{-2/3}[/itex]j becomes 1/0, giving i + ∞j.

HallsofIvy said:
As for (2), [itex]e^s[/itex] exists for all s so try [itex]e^s[/itex]i+ [itex]e^{s/3}[/itex]j.
Do you see why that is also a parameterization for the curve?

Yeah. dx/ds in this case would be defined at s=0, which is what we want. Is this sort of like 'moving' the origin?