Paricles in crossed electric and magnetic field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of an electron and a positron moving in a crossed electric field (-y-direction) and magnetic field (+z-direction). The forces acting on the particles are derived using Lorentz's Force Law, leading to the conclusion that the forces on the electron and positron are not equal, which contradicts the premise that they cannot be separated. The participants clarify that the electric field should have the same sign for both particles, and adjustments to the magnetic field are necessary to maintain a straight-line path. The final consensus is that for the particles to remain together, the magnetic field must be adjusted to point in the opposite direction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz's Force Law
  • Familiarity with electric and magnetic field interactions
  • Knowledge of vector cross products
  • Basic principles of particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Lorentz's Force in particle motion
  • Explore the conditions for charged particle trajectories in crossed fields
  • Investigate the role of magnetic fields in cathode ray tube (CRT) experiments
  • Learn about the behavior of antiparticles in electromagnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and researchers interested in electromagnetism, particle dynamics, and the behavior of charged particles in electric and magnetic fields.

iAlexN
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
An electron and a positron are moving in the +x-direction with the same velocity in a crossed electric and magnetic field (the fields are perpendicular). The question states it's impossible to separate them using this configuration.

The electric field is pointing in the -y-direction and the magnetic field, out of the page (+z-direction). Taking the +y-direction as positive for the electric field and vB, I get this:

F_e = -e(E-vB) = e(-E+vB) (force on electron)
F_p = e(-E-vB) (force on positron)

The cross product between the velocity (in the +x-direction) and the magnetic field (+z-direction) points the same for the electron and the positron (I think), -y-direction.

As you can see F_e and F_p are not equal, so the particles would be separated, which is not supposed to be possible.

But I just cannot find where I go wrong.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why is there a minus sign for the positron E field magnitude and not for the electron E field?
How did you account for the attractive force between the positron and the electron?
 
iAlexN said:
Fe=−e(EvB)=e(−E+vB)F_e = -e(E-vB) = e(-E+vB) (force on electron)
Fp=e(−EvB)F_p = e(-E-vB) (force on positron)


Why do you have -E in the force on the positron?

For a given E field, the forces on an electron and a positron should be in opposite directions.
 
jtbell said:
Why do you have -E in the force on the positron?

For a given E field, the forces on an electron and a positron should be in opposite directions.

I agree, the E-field should have the same sign, in this situation I defined the minus y-direction as negative. I get:

Fe=−e(-E−vB) = e(E+vB)
Fp=e(-E−vB)

Supposedly (according to the question) you need not consider the attraction between the electron and the positron, just the Lorentz's Force to show this.

However, this gives that the magnetic force on the electron and positron are in the same direction as the electric force, which means they would separate? But they are not supposed to.
 
Oh now I get you!
Lets see - electric field is ##\vec E = -E\hat\jmath##, the magnetic field is ##\vec B = B\hat k##, and the velocity is ##\vec v = v\hat\imath##

Check my reasoning...
For an arbitrary charge q:
##\vec F = q\big[-E\hat\jmath + vB(\hat\imath \times \hat k = -\hat j)\big] = q(-E - vB )\hat\jmath##

For the particle to maintain a straight line path, ##E+ vB=0## ... if you fix the electric field and adjust the magnet, you see that it has to be ##B=-E/v < 0##
i.e. the magnetic field needs to point the other way; well done.

Is this in the context of a CRT experiment?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
994