I am trying to understand the following which is proving difficult:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

It is found that (and the proof here is clear)

[P, Jj] anticommutes with Vi

Where P = parity operator

Jj and Vi are the j th and i th components of the angular momentum vector and an arbitrary vector respectively.

It is then stated that because P has the same anticommuting property, that [P,Jj] must be proportional to P ,ie that

[P,Jj] = λP

Where λ is a scalar and the same for all j

I am unclear how this is imputed. Why should they be proportional.

Thanks in advance

(ref is Binney and Skinner QM book Chapter 4 page 66

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Parity operators and anti commutators

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Parity operators anti |
---|

I How to pick an operator onto which the wavefunction collapses |

I The Ehrenfest Theorem |

A Inverse momentum operator |

B Questions about parity |

I Why does a photon have parity -1 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**