Parity Violation in Weak Decay

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of parity violation in weak decay, exploring its mathematical description and implications in quantum mechanics. Participants seek to clarify the nature of parity violation, its historical context, and its relation to particle chirality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a detailed explanation of parity violation and its mathematical description, expressing concern about the complexity given their introductory background in quantum mechanics.
  • Another participant suggests that explaining parity violation in detail is too extensive for forum posts and recommends consulting books instead.
  • A simple example of parity violation is mentioned, specifically referencing the Wu experiment, although details are not elaborated upon.
  • A later reply discusses the difficulty of understanding the mathematics of parity violation, noting that parity is conserved in electromagnetic interactions but not in weak decay.
  • The concept of chirality is introduced, with a focus on neutrinos and antineutrinos in weak decay, highlighting their spin direction and the ability to distinguish between mirror image worlds.
  • Historical context is provided, mentioning Fermi's interaction Hamiltonian for weak decay and the acceptance of the V-A theory, which does not conserve parity and involves two-component spinors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and complexity regarding parity violation, with some agreeing on its challenging nature while others emphasize the need for more detailed resources. No consensus is reached on the best way to explain the topic.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects limitations in the participants' understanding of the mathematical framework of parity violation, as well as the historical development of the theories involved. Specific mathematical steps and definitions remain unresolved.

svrphy
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I just came across the following Quote in an introductory Quantum physics book"There are certain experiments in which behave differently in their mirror image form, this is called the Parity Violation in." Can anybody explain in detail what parity violation is and what mathematical description is used for it. I just had an introductory level course in Quantum Mechanics so Can this be a hard thing to understand mathematically ? I remember having possibly coming across something called a Right Handed Particle & a Left Handed Particle in this Context. Can anybody detail this as well (if my terminology is correct):redface:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Parity and parity violation is too much to explain in detail in forum posts, books would be better.
A simple example of parity violation is the Wu experiment.
 
Can this be a hard thing to understand mathematically ? I remember having possibly coming across something called a Right Handed Particle & a Left Handed Particle
yes,it is hard to understand it mathematically.Parity is conserved with electromagnetic interaction but it is not the case with weak decay.The neutrinos for example in weak decay has a certain chirality i.e. neutrino and antineutrino comes with direction of spin opposite always in weak decay.So now it is possible to differentiate between a mirror image world and say real world.you can tell which hand is right and which is left.The mathematics of it has to do with some historical remarks which was used first by fermi to write an interaction hamiltonian for weak decay.After too many years it became accepted as V-A theory which does not conserve parity.it has property that it uses two component spinors which corresponds to a particular hand however it can be written in terms of 4 spinors
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
546
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K