We have a function f:R^2->R and it has partial derivative of 2nd order.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Show that [itex]f_{xy}=0 \forall (x,y)\in \mathbb{R}^2 \Leftrightarrow f(x,y)=g(x)+h(y)[/itex]

The <= is self explanatory, the => I am not sure I got the right reasoning.

I mean we know that from the above we have: [itex]f_x=F(x)[/itex] (it's a question before this one), but now besides taking an integral I don't see how to show the consequent.

Any thoughts how to show this without invoking integration?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Partial derivatives (question I am grading).

Loading...

Similar Threads - Partial derivatives question | Date |
---|---|

Question about partial derivatives. | Oct 6, 2015 |

Partial Derivatives Question | Sep 25, 2015 |

Question about limit definition of partial derivative | May 17, 2014 |

Partial derivative question | Apr 18, 2014 |

Simple partial derivative question | Jun 11, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**