Partial Fraction Decomposition With Quadratic Term

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the concept of partial fraction decomposition as presented in Serge Lang's "A First Course in Calculus." The example provided involves the integral of the function \(\int\frac{x+1}{(x-1)^2(x-2)}dx\), which is decomposed into the form \(\frac{c_1}{x-1}+\frac{c_2}{(x-1)^2}+\frac{c_3}{x-2}\). The inclusion of both \(x-1\) and \((x-1)^2\) in the decomposition is necessary to account for the polynomial degree in the denominator, ensuring that the numerator can be expressed in a form suitable for integration. This approach simplifies the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation
  • Basic concepts of rational functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of partial fraction decomposition in detail
  • Practice integrating rational functions using partial fractions
  • Explore polynomial long division for cases where the degree of the numerator exceeds that of the denominator
  • Review examples from "A First Course in Calculus" by Serge Lang
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of integration techniques involving rational functions.

Cosmophile
Messages
111
Reaction score
2
Hey, all! I'm learning partial fraction decomposition from Serge Lang's "A First Course in Calculus." In it, he gives the following example:

\int\frac{x+1}{(x-1)^2(x-2)}dx

He then decomposes this into the following sum:

\frac{x+1}{(x-1)^2(x-2)} = \frac{c_1}{x-1}+\frac{c_2}{(x-1)^2}+\frac{c_3}{x-2}

My question is this: On the right hand side (RHS), ##x-1## and ##(x-1)^2## appear. Why is this the case, when the original denominator only had the ##(x-1)^2##? I hope this makes sense, and any help here is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you left out the x-1 denominator term, then the numerator for (x-1)^2 would be a+bx. The expression you are given is equivalent and is easier to integrate.
 
I'm afraid I don't really understand. Could you explain more explicitly, or direct me to a good resource on this?
 
I've answer this in a previous thread, so read that first and then you can ask more questions here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K