MHB Partial fraction decomposition (x-3)/(x^2+4x+3)

AI Thread Summary
To perform partial fraction decomposition of (x-3)/(x^2+4x+3), the denominator is factored into (x+3)(x+1). The next step involves expressing the fraction as A/(x+3) + B/(x+1) and eliminating the fractions by multiplying both sides by the denominator. By substituting specific values for x, such as -3 and -1, A and B can be determined easily. The resulting equations yield A = -2 and B = 3, confirming the decomposition. This method effectively simplifies the original expression into its partial fractions.
Guzman10
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
(x-3)/(x^2+4x+3)
After i factor the denominator what do i do next to find A and B?
=(x-3)/(x+3)(x+1)
=A/(x+3)+B/(x+1)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First try to get rid of the fractions. Any ideas?

Then once you do that you can let $x$ equal any value you want. Choose $x$ such that $A$ or $B$ cancels out, then you can solve for the other one. Can you make any progress now? :)
 
Yes, thanks alot
 
Now,to find a,multiplying both sides of the equality by (x+3);

(x-3)/(x+1) =A + B(x+3)/(x+1)

Now,setting x=-3 or x+3=0,makes the expression on the right containing (x+3) vanish. So,

(-3-3)/(-3+1)=A+0 .Then,

A=3

You could find B by a similar method.
 
\frac{x- 3}{x^2+ 4x+ 3}= \frac{x- 3}{(x+ 1)(x+ 3)}= \frac{A}{x+1}+ \frac{B}{x+3}

There are several different ways to do this. The most obvious is to add the fractions on the right side: <div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">\frac{x- 3}{(x+ 1)(x+ 3)}</span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><br /> <span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">=</span></span>\frac{A(x+3)}{(x+ 1)(x+ 3)}+ \frac{B(x+ 1)}{(x+1)(x+ 3)}=\frac{Ax+ 3A+ Bx+ B}{x^2+ 4x^2+ 3}

so we must have (A+ B)x+ (3A+ B)= x- 3. In order that this be true for all x we must have (A+ B)x= x and 3A+ B= -3. Solve the equations A+ B= 1 and 3A+ B= -3 for A and B.

Multiply both sides of the equation by (x+ 1)(x+ 3): x- 3= A(x+ 3)+ B(x+ 1).

And now we can write x- 3= (A+ B)x+ 3A+ B so we must have the A+ B= 1 and 3A+ B= -3 as before. 3A+ B=-3. A+ B= 1" 2A= -4. A= -2. B= 3

Or, since this is to be true for all x we can simply choose two values for x to get to equations. If we take x= 0 (just because it is an easy number) we have -3= 3A+ B again. If we take x= 1 we have -2= 4A+ 2B. Dividing by 2 gives 2A+ B= -1. That last is a new equation but satisfied by the same A and B.

The simplest method is to choose x= -1 and x= -3 because they make the coefficients of one of A and B 0. If x= -1 we have -1- 3= -4= A(-1+ 3)+ B(-1+ 1) so 2A= -4. Taking x= -3 we have -3- 3= -6= A(-3+ 3)+ B(-3+ 1) so -2B= -6.

 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top