MHB Partial fraction decomposition

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing rational functions as partial fractions. For the first example, the expression $$\frac{3x+4}{x^2+3x+2}$$ is decomposed into $$\frac{2}{x+2}+\frac{1}{x+1}$$ after factoring the denominator. The participants are expected to apply similar methods for the other two expressions involving more complex denominators. The conversation emphasizes understanding the structure of partial fraction decomposition and the steps involved in simplifying these rational functions. Overall, the thread aims to clarify the process of partial fraction decomposition for various rational expressions.
Jordan1994
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Q3.) Express as partial fractions.

a) $$\frac{3x+4}{x^2+3x+2}$$

b) $$\frac{5x^2+5x+8}{(x+2)\left(x^2+2 \right)}$$

c) $$\frac{x^2+15x+21}{(x+2)^2(x-3)}$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let's begin with a). Can you state the form the partial fraction will take?
 
Here's a) without the full method:

$$\begin{align*}
\frac{3x+4}{{{x}^{2}}+3x+2}&=\frac{3x+4}{(x+1)(x+2)} \\
& =\frac{2x+2+x+2}{(x+1)(x+2)} \\
& =\frac{2(x+1)+x+2}{(x+1)(x+2)} \\
& =\frac{2}{x+2}+\frac{1}{x+1}. \\
\end{align*}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top