Partial Fractions: Decomposing a Rational Function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of decomposing a rational function into partial fractions, specifically addressing the conditions under which this decomposition is valid and the implications of substituting values that make the original function undefined.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the decomposition of a rational function and questions the validity of substituting values that make the function undefined.
  • Another participant argues that the decomposition is valid for certain types of functions, such as constants or linear polynomials, but not for higher degree polynomials.
  • A participant highlights the confusion regarding substituting values into an equation after multiplication, noting that the original function's restrictions still apply.
  • Another participant asserts that once both sides of the equation are multiplied by a factor that could be zero, the new equation is defined for all values of x, including those that were previously undefined.
  • There is a discussion about the indeterminate form of expressions when substituting certain values, emphasizing the need to consider the implications of such substitutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of substituting values that make the original rational function undefined. Some argue that the new equation allows for such substitutions, while others maintain that the restrictions from the original function still apply. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these substitutions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the mathematical implications of substituting values that lead to indeterminate forms, nor does it clarify the conditions under which the decomposition is valid for different types of functions.

PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
Suppose we have a rational function ##P## defined by:
$$P(x) = \frac{f(x)}{(x-a)(x-b)}$$
This is defined for all ##x##, except ##x = a## and ##x = b##.
To decompose this function into partial fractions we do the following:
$$\frac{f(x)}{(x-a)(x-b)} = \frac{A}{x-a} + \frac{B}{x-b}$$
Multiplying both sides by ##(x-a)(x-b)##:
$$f(x) = A(x-b) + B(x-a)$$
Which again holds whenever ##x## does not equal ##a## or ##b##.
To find ##A## or ##B##, we set ##x## equal to ##a## or ##b##, which is confusing. Didn't we state earlier that the rational function, and all steps that took us from the first equation to the last equation, are only valid when ##x## does not equal ##a## or ##b##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MohammedRady97 said:
Suppose we have a rational function ##P## defined by:
$$P(x) = \frac{f(x)}{(x-a)(x-b)}$$
This is defined for all ##x##, except ##x = a## and ##x = b##.
To decompose this function into partial fractions we do the following:
$$\frac{f(x)}{(x-a)(x-b)} = \frac{A}{x-a} + \frac{B}{x-b}$$
In general, no. If f(x) happens to be a constant or a linear polynomial, the above is valid, but if f(x) is a higher degree polynomial or other function, it doesn't work. For example, it doesn't work if P(x) is ##\frac{x^3}{(x - a)(x - b)}##.
MohammedRady97 said:
Multiplying both sides by ##(x-a)(x-b)##:
$$f(x) = A(x-b) + B(x-a)$$
Which again holds whenever ##x## does not equal ##a## or ##b##.
To find ##A## or ##B##, we set ##x## equal to ##a## or ##b##, which is confusing. Didn't we state earlier that the rational function, and all steps that took us from the first equation to the last equation, are only valid when ##x## does not equal ##a## or ##b##?
The equation f(x) = A(x - b) + B(x - a) is valid for all values of x, including a and b, so there is no problem setting x to either of these values.

Consider the equation ##\frac{x^2 - 4}{x - 2} = x + 2##. The left side is not defined if x = 2. If we multiply both sides by x - 2, we get x2 - 4 = (x + 2)(x - 2). Here, both sides are defined for all values of x. Since we're no longer dividing by an expression that could be zero, there are no longer any restrictions on x.
 
Last edited:
In your example, when both sides of the equation are multiplied by ##x-2##, isn't the fact that ##x ≠ 2## implied?
The value of ##\frac{x-2}{x-2}## is indeterminate if ##x = 2##.
 
MohammedRady97 said:
In your example, when both sides of the equation are multiplied by ##x-2##, isn't the fact that ##x ≠ 2## implied?
Yes. However, in the new equation, there are no restrictions on x.
The two expressions...
##\frac{x^2-4}{x-2} ## and x + 2
have identical values except when x = 2.
The expression on the left is undefined when x = 2, but the expression on the right is defined, and has a value of 4.

When you multiply both sides of the equation ## \frac{f(x)}{(x - a)(x - b)} = \frac A {x - a} + \frac B {x - b}##, you get a new equation that does not involve division, and so is defined for all x, including x = a and x = b. So there is no problem in substituting either of these values to find your constants A and B.
MohammedRady97 said:
The value of ##\frac{x-2}{x-2}## is indeterminate if ##x = 2##.
Yes, of course.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K