Partial fractions on exponentials

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Partial fractions cannot be directly applied to expressions involving exponential factors such as 3^x / ((2^x + 3^x)(5^x + 6^x). The decomposition fails unless all bases are the same or are integer powers of the lowest base. A valid approach involves substitution, such as using u = e^x, particularly for integrals like 1/(e^{2x} + 2e^x + 1). The decomposition is successful when the denominator consists of conjugate pairs and the numerator can be expressed in terms of those bases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial fraction decomposition
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of substitution methods in integration
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the rules of partial fraction decomposition for rational functions
  • Learn about substitution techniques in integration, specifically with exponential functions
  • Explore cases where exponential bases can be manipulated for partial fractions
  • Examine examples of integrating functions involving conjugate pairs in the denominator
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus, and anyone interested in advanced integration techniques involving exponential functions.

CuriousJ
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to use partial fractions on exponential factors? An expression like this for example...

3^x
______________________
(2^x + 3^x)(5^x + 6^x)

Would it break down into something like this?
A^x/(2^x + 3^x) + B^x/(5^x + 6^x)

What are the rules for repeated factors and non-repeated, etc.? I am trying to figure out how the rules for partial fractions would apply to this type of problem. How would I solve for A and B?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi CuriousJ! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
CuriousJ said:
Is it possible to use partial fractions on exponential factors? An expression like this for example...

3^x
______________________
(2^x + 3^x)(5^x + 6^x)

Would it break down into something like this?
A^x/(2^x + 3^x) + B^x/(5^x + 6^x)

No, it's not possible …

you'd have an equation (I'll use f(x) and g(x) instead of your Ax and Bx) like f(x)(5x + 6x) + g(x)(2x + 3x) = 3x, which isn't going to work. :wink:
 
Could you use it if you made a substitution? If you had to integrate 1/ex2+2ex+1 you'd want to substitute u=ex then use partial fractions.
 
ex-xian said:
Could you use it if you made a substitution? If you had to integrate 1/ex2+2ex+1 you'd want to substitute u=ex then use partial fractions.


As long as you meant 1/(e^{2x} + 2e^x + 1) (that is, e^{2x} as opposed to e^{x^2}, which is quite different), yes, I see no problems with using a "substitution" like that to partial fraction decompose it, for the particular case you've given.

The problem with the example in the OP is that you can't make a useful substitution like that in order to decompose the expression. You could write each term as u^{ln(b)}, where u = e^x and b is whatever the base of the exponential was, but the ln(b)'s won't be integers and so the decomposition would fail.

In order for the decomposition to work you'd need either all of the bases to be the same or integers powers of the lowest base.
 
Right, e^2x. Thanks for catching that.
 
The decomposition seems to work when the denominator is a conjugate pair and the numerator can be reduced to one of those bases...

Example:
2^x/((2^x + 5^x)(2^x - 5^x)) = 1/[2(5^x + 2^x)] - 1/[2(5^x - 2^x)]

Thanks tiny-tim and Mute, for answering my question. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K