# Partial Fractions: Solving s/(s^2 + 4)(s^2 + 9)

• a.mlw.walker
As it turns out in this problem, your values of A = s/5 and B = -s/5 happen to work out, but I'm reasonably sure this is only an accident.
a.mlw.walker
Hi, had to learn partial fractions last year for laplace transforms, but have forgotten the general rules, and now i can't work out how to turn this into partial fractions:

$$\frac{s}{\left(s^{2}+4\right)\left(s^{2}+9\right)}$$

$$\frac{s}{\left(s^{2}+4\right)\left(s^{2}+9\right)}=\frac{A}{s^{2}+4}+\frac{B}{s^{2}+9}$$
so

$$s=A\left(s^{2}+9\right)+B\left(s^{2}+4\right)$$

i understand that i am supposed to strategically choose s to make A or B zero, but sith the s^2 I'm not sure what to do

thanks

make the coefficient 0

by setting s to what?

a.mlw.walker said:
Hi, had to learn partial fractions last year for laplace transforms, but have forgotten the general rules, and now i can't work out how to turn this into partial fractions:

$$\frac{s}{\left(s^{2}+4\right)\left(s^{2}+9\right)}$$

$$\frac{s}{\left(s^{2}+4\right)\left(s^{2}+9\right)}=\frac{A}{s^{2}+4}+\frac{B}{s^{2}+9}$$
This is not the way to decompose irreducible quadratic factors. Here's what you should have:
$$\frac{s}{\left(s^{2}+4\right)\left(s^{2}+9\right)}=\frac{As + B}{s^{2}+4}+\frac{Cs + D}{s^{2}+9}$$

a.mlw.walker said:
so

$$s=A\left(s^{2}+9\right)+B\left(s^{2}+4\right)$$

i understand that i am supposed to strategically choose s to make A or B zero, but sith the s^2 I'm not sure what to do

thanks

ok, yeah i wondered, but mupad's soln looked so simple i didnt think there could be 4 unkowns. So can i now multiply everything by the denomiator of s on the LHS.

What i don't understand is usually you would choose values for s to make most unkowns 0, then calculate for each unkown. but here, there is no s that can make
S^2 + 4 =0 without imaginary numbers?

a.mlw.walker said:
ok, yeah i wondered, but mupad's soln looked so simple i didnt think there could be 4 unkowns. So can i now multiply everything by the denomiator of s on the LHS.

What i don't understand is usually you would choose values for s to make most unkowns 0, then calculate for each unkown. but here, there is no s that can make
S^2 + 4 =0 without imaginary numbers?

You should then write the partial fraction expansion as follows:

s/[(s^2+4)(s^2+9)] = A/(s+2i) + A*/(s-2i) + B/(s+3i) + B*(s-3i)

Where the star denotes complex conjugation. The "strategic value" method now becomes trivial, you don't have to actually write down any equations. If you know about complex analysis, you'll recognize the coefficients as the residues of the function at the poles and compute them directly. If you don't know this, you can easily see that e.g. multiplying boith sides by s + 2i and taking the limit s to -2i will yield A.

An obvious way to simplify
$$\frac{s}{\left(s^{2}+4\right)\left(s^{2}+9\right)} =\frac{As+B}{s^{2}+4}+\frac{Cs+D}{s^{2}+9}$$
is to multiply both sides by $(s^2+ 4)(s^2+ 9)$ to get
s= (As+B)(s^2+9)+ (Cs+D)(s^2+4).

Because those denominators were "irreducible" you cannot "make a coefficient 0" but you still need only 4 equations to solve for the 4 constants.

One way would be to take s to be 4 simple numbers, say s= 0, s= 1, s= -1, and s= 2.

If n= 0, your equation is 0= 9B+ 4D. If s= 1, it is 1= 10A+ 10B +5s+ 5D, etc.

Another way to get 4 equations is to multiply out that right side:

s= (As+B)(s^2+9)+ (Cs+D)(s^2+9)= As^3+ Bs^2+ As+ 9B+ Cs^3+ Ds^2+ Cs+ D.
0s^3+ 0s^2+ s+ 0= (A+ C)s^3+ (B+D)s^2+ (A+C)+ B+D.

In order for those to be equal for all s, the "corresponding coefficients" must be the same: we must have A+ C= 0, B+ D= 0, A+ C= 1, and B+ D= 0.

Why can't this be done:
As^2 +9A +Bs^2 +4B=0
A+B=0
9A+4B=s
A=s/5, B=-s/5

vin300 said:
Why can't this be done:
As^2 +9A +Bs^2 +4B=0
A+B=0
9A+4B=s
A=s/5, B=-s/5
Mainly because it isn't correct. It took me some time to figure out what you had done, but going back to the OP, I was able to follow your reasoning. In the first post in this thread, a.mlw.walker thought that (incorrectly) that this would be the way to go:
$$\frac{s}{\left(s^{2}+4\right)\left(s^{2}+9\right)} =\frac{A}{s^{2}+4}+\frac{B}{s^{2}+9}$$
$$s=A\left(s^{2}+9\right)+B\left(s^{2}+4\right)$$

Your first equation is As^2 +9A +Bs^2 +4B=0, but where you have zero on the right side, you should have s, but I think that was a typo on your part. You are reasoning that since there is no s^2 term on the right side, A + B (the coefficient of s^2) has to be zero, and that 9A + 4B has to be s.

Your values for A and B satisfy the equation A + B = 0, but they don't satisfy 9A + 4B = s.

Why not? What is 9s/5 -4s/5 ?

Solved it by doing what Mark44 said.

vin300 said:
Why not? What is 9s/5 -4s/5 ?
9s/5 - 4s/5 = s

The main problem with your technique is the difference between equations that are identically true (true for all values of the variable) and those that are conditionally true (true only for certain values of the variable). In partial fractions decomposition, the idea is to rewrite the product on the left side below as a sum in such a way that the equation is identically true. A and B on the right side have to be constants.
$$\frac{s}{\left(s^{2}+4\right)\left(s^{2}+9\right)} =\frac{A}{s^{2}+4}+\frac{B}{s^{2}+9}$$

By multiplying both sides by (s2 + 4)(s2 + 9), you get the next equation, which also has to be identically true.
$$s=A\left(s^{2}+9\right)+B\left(s^{2}+4\right)$$

If we group like terms together on the right side, we get
s = (A + B)s2 + (9A + 4B)

This is the same as 0s2 + 1s + 0 = (A + B)s2 + (9A + 4B)

For this equation to be identically true, we have to have A + B = 0 and 9A + 4B = 0 so that the coefficients of s2, s, and the constant term are equal on both sides of the equation. The only way two polynomials of the same degree can be identically equal is for their corresponding coefficients to be equal.

Using you technique, we have A + B = 0 and 9A + 4B = 0, which gives A = B = 0, and we also have an s term on the left side that is not matched on the right side.

As it turns out in this problem, your values of A = s/5 and B = -s/5 happen to work out, but I'm reasonably sure this is only an accident.

you were talking to vin300 not me right?

vin300 said:
Why can't this be done:
As^2 +9A +Bs^2 +4B=0
A+B=0
9A+4B=s
A=s/5, B=-s/5
The whole point of "partial fractions" is that A and B must be constants, not functions of s.

## 1. What are partial fractions?

Partial fractions are a method of breaking down a complex fraction into simpler fractions. This is useful in integration and solving differential equations.

## 2. How do you solve s/(s^2 + 4)(s^2 + 9) using partial fractions?

To solve this expression, we first need to factor the denominator into linear and quadratic terms: (s^2 + 4)(s^2 + 9) = (s + 2i)(s - 2i)(s + 3i)(s - 3i). Then, we set up the partial fractions as follows: s/(s^2 + 4)(s^2 + 9) = A/(s + 2i) + B/(s - 2i) + C/(s + 3i) + D/(s - 3i). We can then solve for the constants A, B, C, and D by equating the coefficients of each term on both sides.

## 3. What is the purpose of using partial fractions?

Partial fractions allow us to simplify and manipulate complex fractions, making it easier to solve equations and perform integration. It also helps us to identify patterns and relationships within the fraction.

## 4. Are there any limitations to using partial fractions?

Partial fractions can only be used for rational functions, meaning that the numerator and denominator must be polynomials. It also requires that the degree of the numerator is less than the degree of the denominator.

## 5. Can you use partial fractions to solve any type of equation?

No, partial fractions are primarily used in solving integrals and differential equations. They may not be applicable or necessary for solving other types of equations.

• General Math
Replies
2
Views
10K
• General Math
Replies
3
Views
721
• General Math
Replies
0
Views
9K
• General Math
Replies
4
Views
10K
• General Math
Replies
1
Views
10K
• General Math
Replies
1
Views
10K
• General Math
Replies
1
Views
9K
• General Math
Replies
9
Views
1K
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
453
• General Math
Replies
11
Views
2K