Partial sum of harmonic series as an improper fraction

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the partial sum of the harmonic series as an improper fraction can be complex, as demonstrated by the example of summing 1/2 to 1/10, which results in the fraction 6,999,840/3,628,800 that simplifies to 4861/2520. Users are seeking programs or calculators that can handle these calculations and simplify the results automatically. The discussion mentions that advanced calculators like the Casio ClassPad and TI-89 can perform these sums, while the TI-83 is also noted for its capabilities. For larger sums, such as up to 1/100, the output can be lengthy and cumbersome if not simplified. Online tools like Wolfram Alpha are suggested for handling such calculations efficiently.
starfish99
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I am interested in calculating a a partial sum of harmonic series as an improper fraction.

I added 1/2+1/3+1/4+1/5+1/6+1/7+1/8+1/9+1/10 with my calculator by finding a common denominator and got the fraction 6 999 840/3 628 800. It would take some time to do it for 1/2+1/3+...1/100.

Is there any program that can create these fractions for any partial harmonic sum?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your calculator didn't simplify. \frac{6999840}{3628800} simplifies to \frac{4861}{2520} .

As for doing it up to 100, does your calculator do sums? I have a casio classpad, which is similar in capabilities to a TI 89, and it does sums.

Woah, I just had it do up to 1/100, and it's loooooooong. If your calculator isn't going to simplify it, it's going to be crazy.

From what I hear a TI 83 will do it.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Gib Z
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top