B Particle creation and annihilation

Click For Summary
When an electron and positron annihilate, they produce two photons that move in opposite directions to conserve linear momentum. This is a confirmed phenomenon, but it's important to cite credible sources when discussing scientific concepts. For pair production, two photons are typically required, each with energy greater than 511 keV, to ensure conservation of energy and momentum. Alternatively, one photon can facilitate pair production if it has energy exceeding 1022 keV and interacts with an atom, which helps balance momentum. Thus, both energy and momentum conservation are crucial in these particle interactions.
DiracPool
Messages
1,242
Reaction score
515
I read somewhere that when, say, an electron and positron annihilate, they create two photons which travel in opposite directions in order to conserve linear momentum. Is this true? What about pair production. Do you likewise need two photons to do this? Or, can you do it with one photon provided it has enough energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DiracPool said:
I read somewhere that when, say, an electron and positron annihilate, they create two photons which travel in opposite directions in order to conserve linear momentum. Is this true?
Yes, it is true, but “I read somewhere” isn’t a good reference. You should usually explicitly state where you read it.

DiracPool said:
Do you likewise need two photons to do this? Or, can you do it with one photon provided it has enough energy?
Both energy and momentum must be conserved (as well as charge, spin, etc). So one photon cannot do it.

You need two photons with opposite momentum and each with >511 keV energy, or a photon with >1022 keV energy and an atom. In the latter case the atom can take any leftover momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, topsquark and DiracPool
Pair production with one photon takes place when in the presence of a nucleus making the needed momentum, etc. balance.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and DiracPool
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...