Particle in infinite potential well

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on a particle in an infinite potential well, examining the probability distributions at two different times and the implications of the potential well disappearing. At t = 0, the probability distribution is derived from the wavefunction, while at t = π/6ω, it shows a different form. The energy of the particle is debated, with some participants arguing it changes over time, referencing the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE). When the potential disappears, the wavefunction should be expressed as a Fourier transform, indicating a continuous spectrum of wavelengths rather than just discrete states. The conversation emphasizes the need for a correct mathematical approach to describe the transition from a confined state to a free particle.
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



29xxisp.png


Sketch the difference of probability distributions at the two times. Does the energy change with time?

The potential well suddenly disappears, what is the form of the wavefunction?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a)

At t = 0, the probability distribution is:
|\phi|^2 = \frac{1}{a} \left[ sin^2(\frac{2\pi x}{a}) + 2 sin (\frac{2\pi x}{a})sin(\frac{4\pi x}{a}) + sin^2 (\frac{4\pi x}{a}) \right]

At ##t = \frac{\pi}{6\omega}##:
|\phi|^2 = \frac{1}{a} \left[ sin^2(\frac{2\pi x}{a}) + sin^2 (\frac{4\pi x}{a}) \right]

Thus the difference is simply ##\frac{2}{a} sin(\frac{2\pi x}{a}) sin (\frac{4\pi x}{a})##:

33acnkn.png


I think the energy of the particle changes with time, as simply using the TDSE ##-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial x^2} = E \phi## doesn't remove the ##exp(i\omega t)## terms.Part (b)

As the potential disappears, the particle becomes free. I think the general form is a linear combination of the n=2 and n=1 states.

For a free particle, ##u_{(x)} = A e^{i\frac{px}{\hbar}} = e^{ikx}##.

Thus, the form is:
\phi = Ae^{i(2kx - \omega t)} + Be^{i(4kx - \omega t)}

Not sure if I'm right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Part b is not right. You have to expand the wave function using a Fourier transform. In your solution the particle jumps from a confined solution to a couple of plane waves that extend to infinity. That doesn't make sense. The Fourier transform will include all sorts of wavelengths - not just 2.
 
dauto said:
Part b is not right. You have to expand the wave function using a Fourier transform. In your solution the particle jumps from a confined solution to a couple of plane waves that extend to infinity. That doesn't make sense. The Fourier transform will include all sorts of wavelengths - not just 2.

So the solution would be:

\phi = \sum_p a_p e^{i(\frac{xp}{\hbar} - \omega t)}

Does this look right?
 
The solution seems a little short for 5 marks, in my opinion
 
Well you should use a Fourier transform as opposed to a Fourier expansion because the particles are free at the end of the problem. That means you should have an integral instead of a sum.
 
unscientific said:
I think the energy of the particle changes with time, as simply using the TDSE ##-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial x^2} = E \phi## doesn't remove the ##exp(i\omega t)## terms.

unscientific - I don't understand why you think the energy changes.

That equation looks like the TISE, not the TDSE.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
630
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K