Particle Position: Understanding its Significance and Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter ch2kb0x
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Position
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the significance and calculation of particle position, particularly focusing on methods to determine when the velocity is zero. The subject area includes concepts from calculus and graphical analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods to solve the problem, including graphical analysis and mathematical approaches such as taking derivatives and using the quadratic equation. There are questions about the correctness of derived values and the appropriateness of methods based on the participant's background in calculus.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering multiple approaches and questioning the accuracy of results. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of calculus and graphing, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct method or solution.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential confusion regarding the necessity of the quadratic formula and the implications of having calculus knowledge. Additionally, a participant expresses concern over a deleted question, indicating a possible disruption in the flow of discussion.

ch2kb0x
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
i got the answer. thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Theres a few ways to solve it.
You could graph it (like you were thinking). Because the velocity (change in position with time) should be 0 then just look for wherever the slope is equal to 0. There should be 2 times when this happens.

OR, you could take the derivative of that equation and graph that, then it's velocity is 0 simply wherever the graph is equal to 0. (still 2 spots)

OR you could just do it mathematically, which would be the second method above, but instead of graphing, just set it to 0 and solve for t. I think you'll need the quadratic equation if you do it this way.
 
Perillux said:
... OR you could just do it mathematically, which would be the second method above, but instead of graphing, just set it to 0 and solve for t. I think you'll need the quadratic equation if you do it this way.

If ch2kb0x has had some calculus, that is the way to go. The Quadratic Formula won't be necessary for this problem.

Without calculus, graphing is the way to go.
 
I took the derivative and graphed it. I got t=0 and t=13 when the curve hits 0 on the "t-axis", but that seems to be the incorrect answer. any help?
 
You deleted the question, so how can we help you? Please don't delete whole posts like that after people have already responded to it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
786
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K