Particles - subparticles - subsubparticles

  • #1
4
0
Why recent particle physicists don’t consider models of particles (quarks, leptons)
built from more light subparticles?
Is there problems of principle
or the available experimental data don’t need similar models?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
26,439
9,959
Why recent particle physicists don’t consider models of particles (quarks, leptons)
built from more light subparticles?
Before you ask why something is so, uiut's a good idea to find out if it is so. The LHC experiments have published about a dozen papers searching for such things. And not finding them.
 
  • #3
julian
Gold Member
615
126
As an example, there were the old preon models but the binding energies well exceeded quark, lepton rest masses. More recently, new preon models are coming from q-deformed LQG where "preon configurations" come about by an entirely different mechanism and so does not necessarily suffer from the drawback of the old models.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
tom.stoer
Science Advisor
5,766
162
More recently, new preon models are coming from q-deformed LQG where "preon configurations" come about by an entirely different mechanism and so does not necessarily suffer from the drawback of the old models.
but afaik there has not been much progress (or even research activities) over the last couple of years
 
  • #5
julian
Gold Member
615
126
but afaik there has not been much progress (or even research activities) over the last couple of years
Yes - afaik.
 
  • #6
4
0
If something is not forbidden, it is possible.

I find preon hypothesis interesting, but not sufficiently deep.
 
Top