Passive sign convention (negative watts, and negative current confusion)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the passive sign convention in electrical circuits, particularly focusing on the interpretation of current and power in relation to a rechargeable battery. Participants explore the implications of positive and negative currents flowing into different terminals of the battery and how these relate to power absorption and discharge.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definitions of positive and negative currents and their effects on power calculations. There is uncertainty about the implications of current direction and terminal polarity, particularly in relation to a battery's operation. Some participants express confusion about specific scenarios and seek clarification on their observations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's interpretations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the consistency of sign conventions and the importance of understanding the context of the problem. However, there remains a lack of consensus on specific interpretations and calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for clarity in defining terminal polarities and the potential for misinterpretation of questions in the context of homework problems. There are references to images that are pending approval, which may be relevant to the discussion but are not currently accessible.

FocusedWolf
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
This is my (error full?) understanding from my readings:

1. positive current flowing into a positive terminal of let's say a rechargeable battery is power being absorbed by the battery...so positive watts

2. negative current flowing into a positive terminal encounters the higher electrical potential at the positive terminal and the battery has to do work to carry it through to the negative terminal, so the battery is discharging...so negative watts

3. positive current flowing into negative terminal... charges the battery?

4. negative current flowing into the negative terminal... discharges some watts?

so I'm a bit unsure with the last two and want to know what, if anything, is wrong with my observations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok, sign convention can be a pain but as long as you are consistent, it doesn't really matter whether it is +/-... after all it is just a convention. Now, in calculations, usually common sense can help you out a lot in determining polarities and/or whether a device is active or passive.

In cases where that is not so clear, ie. just a black box, then extra care should be taken. Some general rules:-

negative current is just positive current flowing in the opposite direction

Assuming a 2-terminal device
so -10A into -ve terminal which is the same as 10A out of -ve terminal; which is same as 10A into +ve terminal; which is same as -10A out of +ve terminal!

defining +/- terminals? you may say what if one delibrately defines the polarity so that +ve terminal actually has a lower potential than the -ve terminal (relative to the same ground/ref point). In that case, the voltage across the given device is simply negative .

In the examples you listed, since you know that it is a battery, so your know that when the battery is giving out energy your +ve terminal is the end with higher potential. Of course if it is just a black box, you will probably need more info from the rest of the circuit to be sure. But once everything is worked out (conservation of charge/energy etc...) , if the polarity/direction was set incorrectly, then the voltage/current will simply get a -ve sign. when working on power remember you have two conventions:

P=VI for passive convention (+ve current into +ve terminal)

P=-VI for active device (+ve current into -ve terminal)

NB +/-ve here are AS DEFINED by you in the diagram.

if you are consistent, everything will work out in the end. :smile:
 
I think i figured it out if the attached picture shows it correctly :P
 

Attachments

  • passiveSignConvention.JPG
    passiveSignConvention.JPG
    20.1 KB · Views: 1,125
Hmm no, still confused.

In attached picture, problem (b), if i flip the current arrow so its 1.75A entering the plus side... isn't that passive sign convention satisfied then? and p = (-3.8V) * (1.75A) = -6.65W? book says answer is 6.65W.
 

Attachments

  • hmm.jpg
    hmm.jpg
    29.2 KB · Views: 1,000
can't view your picture, so can't help you. If you are sure that you have been consistent, then you will prevail over the book :smile:
 
ok, i think you have just read the question wrong :smile:

Q 2.7 asks for power being generated... you probably have assumed the wording for 2.6 when answering it ..but the questions clearly refer to which diagram they are talking about...
 
DOOOOH! AAAAHAHAHAHA! :smile:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K