Pauli exclusion regarding nucleons

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dimwatt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nucleons Pauli
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Pauli exclusion principle to nucleons, specifically in the context of deuterons and helium-3 (He^3). The deuteron, composed of a proton and a neutron, exists in an isosinglet state |00> and does not violate the Pauli exclusion principle. In contrast, helium-3 contains two protons and a neutron, where the spins of the protons are opposite, allowing the configuration to comply with the exclusion principle. The key takeaway is that the spin states of nucleons determine their compliance with the Pauli exclusion principle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and the Pauli exclusion principle
  • Familiarity with nucleon configurations and isospin states
  • Knowledge of nuclear physics, particularly the structure of deuterons and helium-3
  • Basic grasp of spin states and their implications in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Pauli exclusion principle in nuclear physics
  • Study the properties and states of deuterons in detail
  • Explore the spin configurations of nucleons in various isotopes
  • Learn about the role of isospin in particle interactions and nuclear stability
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in nuclear physics, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and researchers focusing on particle interactions and nucleon behavior in atomic structures.

dimwatt
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I think this is more or less a quick question.

So deuteron (pn) is an isosinglet in the state |00> =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(pn-np) since it cannot be part of the isotriplet that includes pp and nn, since these violate pauli exclusion. That's fine.

So how is it that we can have atoms like He^3=ppn? How does this not violate Pauli exclusion with two protons bound in the nucleus (both with isospin state |\frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{2}>). It makes some sense if I think of this as a bound state of a proton and deuteron, with the deuteron being a sort of "nucleon" in its own right, where we combine p(pn)=p(d)=|\frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{2}> |00>, but I can't seem to reconcile that with the fact that there are still two identical nucleons (the protons) in a bound state, which sounds like it should violate Pauli exclusion for the same reason as before. What have I misunderstood?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dimwatt said:
What have I misunderstood?
Spin. The deuteron is a 3S1 state, which means the nucleons are both in the same spin state. In He3 on the other hand, the spins of the two protons are opposite.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K