MHB Pay Off Debt: Calculate Interest & Time Needed for Snowball Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cwray
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Debt
Cwray
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm starting a "debt snowball" approach to paying off my debts and am wondering how long it will take to pay them off and how much interest I will end up paying annually. I'm ok with math, but this is too complex for me.

I have:
3 credit cards
car loan
personal loan
401(k) loan

If someone is willing to help me figure it out, that would be great and then I'll give all the specific information. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Paying off your debts is a fantastic thing to do, and I would give you a hearty back slap to encourage you in that process.

To find out how long it will take to pay off any single debt, you must assemble the following information:
  1. Principle - this is the amount of the original loan
  2. Interest rate
  3. Compounding Interval - this is how often the interest is incorporated back into the principle

Once you have all this, the formula for computing how much the loan is worth is given by
$$S=P \left(1+\frac{j}{m} \right)^{\!mt},$$
where
\begin{align*}
S&=\text{value after }m\text{ periods} \\
P&=\text{principle} \\
j&=\text{interest rate} \\
m&=\text{number of times interest is compounded per year} \\
t&=\text{time in years}
\end{align*}
In this formula there is no hint of your payment. How do we put that into the mix? Well, suppose your monthly payment is $b$. Then the amount of money you've paid off at time $t$ is given by $bmt$. This is assuming your payments coincide with the compounding periods. To find out when you will pay back the debt, solve the equation
$$bmt=P \left(1+\frac{j}{m} \right)^{\!mt}$$
for $t$. This is a transcendental equation, and not easily solved. However, you can solve it in terms of the Lambert W, or product log function. WolframAlpha gives the solution
$$t=-\frac{W\left( -\frac{\ln\left(P\left(\frac{j+m}{m}\right)\right)}{b}\right)}{m\ln\left(P\left(\frac{j+m}{m}\right)\right)}.$$
But this is more complicated than you need. I would just whip up an Excel spreadsheet, and play around with both sides of the above equation until you get the LHS to be greater than the RHS. That will be the time when you pay off the loan.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top