PDE and differentiating through the sum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the heat equation, represented as ##u_t = u_{xx}##, under non-homogeneous boundary conditions using eigenfunction expansion. The solution is expressed as ##u(x,t) = \sum a(t) \phi(x)##, where ##\phi(x)## is derived from homogeneous boundary conditions. It is established that differentiation with respect to ##x## under the sum is not permissible due to the mismatch between the boundary conditions of the eigenfunction and the problem at hand. The conversation also highlights an alternative approach of changing variables to incorporate inhomogeneity directly into the PDE.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with eigenfunction expansion techniques
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in mathematical physics
  • Concept of convergence in distribution theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of eigenfunction expansion in detail
  • Learn about non-homogeneous boundary conditions in PDEs
  • Explore the implications of boundary conditions on differentiation in PDE solutions
  • Investigate variable change techniques for handling inhomogeneous PDEs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and researchers focused on solving partial differential equations, particularly those dealing with boundary conditions and eigenfunction methods.

member 428835
Hi PF!

I'm reading my math text and am looking at the heat eq ##u_t = u_{xx}##, where we are are given non-homogenous boundary conditions. We are solving using the method of eigenfunction expansion.

Evidently we begin by finding the eigenfunction ##\phi (x)## related to the homogenous boundary conditions. From here we say the solution takes the form ##u(x,t) = \sum a(t) \phi(x)##. When plugging this result into the heat equation we are not allowed to differentiate w.r.t. x under the sum. The reason evidently is because the boundary conditions for the actual problem and ##\phi(x)## do not agree (the problem has non-homogenous B.C. yet the eigenfunction satisfies homogenous B.C.).

Can anyone tell me why not satisfying the same B.C. conditions implies we cannot differentiate w.r.t. that variable ##x##?

Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The point is that you can approximate the solution arbitrarily well (in a distribution sense) with a function that does not fulfill the BC, i.e., the sum will converge to the solution everywhere but at the boundary.

A different way of taking care of your boundary conditions is to make a change of variables to transfer your inhomogeneity to the PDE rather than the BC. The resulting PDE can be solved using series expansion of the resulting inhomogeneity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K