Peak of the number of daily deaths caused by Covid19

  • Context: COVID 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kent davidge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Peak
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the modeling of daily Covid-19 deaths using a Gaussian function, with a specific prediction of 500 deaths on April 30, which matched the official count. The participant reflects on the accuracy of their model and the need for theoretical justification, particularly in the context of exponential growth in virus spread. They suggest that while their model may have been correct, the true validation will only come at the pandemic's conclusion. The conversation also highlights the relevance of the SIR model, which categorizes the population into susceptible, infected, and recovered groups.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gaussian functions in statistical modeling
  • Familiarity with the SIR model in epidemiology
  • Basic knowledge of exponential growth in infectious diseases
  • Ability to analyze and interpret epidemiological data sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the SIR model and its applications in epidemic forecasting
  • Explore advanced statistical methods for modeling infectious diseases
  • Investigate the implications of Gaussian distributions in public health data
  • Study real-world case studies of Covid-19 modeling and their outcomes
USEFUL FOR

Public health analysts, epidemiologists, data scientists, and anyone involved in modeling disease spread and analyzing Covid-19 data.

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
Around the mid of april, I had done some calculations to get some numbers for daily deaths in my country due to covid19. It was really simple, just a gaussian without taking into account any other factor.

I concluded that if the peak of daily deaths occurred on april 30, we would have about 500 deaths that day. The officially reported number of deaths turned out to be about 500! So if my model was correct, we already passed the peak, right?

But how to know if my model was correct? It seems that I have to wait until the "end" of the pandemic, to see if the peak was indeed reach on april 30. Correct? If that's the case, then my model was giving me the right numbers.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Or you were lucky. It would be nice if there was some theoretical motivation for your model. This is especially true when you are dealing with something like a virus epidemic, where the growth can be exponential and there has been a lot of work on models that have a lot of logic behind them.
 
FactChecker said:
Or you were lucky
:oldbiggrin:
FactChecker said:
It would be nice if there was some theoretical motivation for your model
I think the main motivation is that there must be an increase as more and more people get infected, then as less people get infected (since a large portion of the population already got the virus) less people will die? Until we reach a point far away, aka letting time go to infinity, where essentially nobody is dying from the virus.

I think the most simple mathematical function for describing that is a gaussian.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and kent davidge

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K