A Penetration depth of a ion beam coupled with an EM wave

coquelicot
Messages
295
Reaction score
67
TL;DR Summary
How does the penetration depth of a ion beam coupled with a EM microwave depend upon the frequency of the wave?
A Ion source is a device that allows creating ion beams (e.g. argon ions) and to project them outside the device, for example to be further processed by a particle accelerator, or to irradiate materials or biological tissues etc.
Now, suppose the ion beam is coupled with an EM wave, especially of microwave frequency, and irradiates a given material.
Said very simplistically, the ions will oscillate at the frequency of the wave as they penetrate the irradiated material.
Then it is natural to suspect that the penetration depth of the ions depends not only upon their velocity, but also upon the frequency of the carrying wave.
Is there something known about that? what work has been done in this domain? any reference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The main energy loss mechanism for charged particles in matter is ionization of the matter. There are energy loss tables I used in the distant pass to compute charge particle energy loss in things like thin metal films etc. That said, I'd expect near to no influence on particle energy loss by any microwaves unless the microwaves themselves could ionize the mater. That's a lot of microwaves.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb, coquelicot and vanhees71
Paul Colby said:
The main energy loss mechanism for charged particles in matter is ionization of the matter. There are energy loss tables I used in the distant pass to compute charge particle energy loss in things like thin metal films etc. That said, I'd expect near to no influence on particle energy loss by any microwaves unless the microwaves themselves could ionize the mater. That's a lot of microwaves.
Thx for answering me. How is the energy loss related to the penetration depth (a formula? or a name for a formula in order I can google it?).
 
Bethe-Bloch, should give you a good start
 
  • Like
Likes mfb and coquelicot
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top