Percent Length Contraction (check solution)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of length contraction in the context of special relativity, specifically examining the percent length contraction of an aircraft traveling at Mach 2. Participants are analyzing the calculations related to the formula for length contraction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the percent length contraction using the formula L'/L = √(1 - (v/c)²) and questions the correctness of their result. Other participants suggest rechecking calculations and clarify the speed of light value being used.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in the discussion, with some providing guidance on recalculating and emphasizing the importance of precision in calculations. There is acknowledgment of the small magnitude of the contraction, but no consensus has been reached on the correctness of the original calculation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion arising from the relative speeds involved, particularly the comparison of Mach 2 to the speed of light, which is significantly higher. There is also mention of the importance of not approximating values too early in the calculation process.

Quelsita
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Question:
What is the percent length contraction of an aircraft traveling at Mach 2?

So, we know that Mach 2= 680.58 m/s
and that L'=L[tex]\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}[/tex]

If you divide over the L to get:

L'/L=[tex]\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}[/tex]=% length contraction

Plug-n-chug from here to get:

L'/L=[tex]\sqrt{1-(680.58/c)^2}[/tex]
=[tex]\sqrt{1-(5.15X10^-12)}[/tex]
=[tex]\sqrt{1}[/tex]
=1

Is this correct? It only contracts 1%?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd recheck your calculation and be careful in taking your square root.

680/300,000 is what you were intending I trust?
 
LowlyPion said:
680/300,000 is what you were intending I trust?

Yep. That's why I thought it was off because it's such a small number that you'll have 1 under the radical...

Or is the percent contraction supposed to be very small since the aircraft, compared to the speed of light, is going extremely slow?
 
Yes it is a small number.

And when you take the square root it gets closer to 1.

Use a calculator, and don't approximate or round until you have an expression for the percentage.
 
LowlyPion said:
I'd recheck your calculation and be careful in taking your square root.

680/300,000 is what you were intending I trust?

c = 300,000,000 m/s
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K