Period for SHM of a block on a spring shot by a bullet

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a bullet embedding into a block attached to a spring, with the goal of calculating the period of simple harmonic motion (SHM) after the impact. The user initially calculated the final velocity of the block and bullet system using conservation of momentum, then determined the spring constant by equating kinetic energy to potential energy at maximum compression. However, a critical error was identified regarding the mass of the block, which was mistakenly noted as 0.922 kg instead of the correct 0.992 kg. This miscalculation led to an incorrect period result, prompting the user to seek clarification and assistance. The conversation highlights the importance of careful attention to detail in physics problems.
ggorrilla
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So I've been working on this problem for a while and can't seem to come up with anything and I don't really understand why I'm wrong in what I did. I could just get the answer online, but I actually want to understand what's happening.

Homework Statement



A rifle bullet with mass 8.12g and initial horizontal velocity 250m/s strikes and embeds itself in a block with mass 0.992kg that rests on a frictionless surface and is attached to one end of an ideal spring. The other end of the spring is attached to the wall. The impact compresses the spring a maximum distance of 18.0cm. After the impact, the block moves in SHM. Calculate the period of this motion.

Homework Equations



(Period) T = 2pi*sqrt(m/k)
(Kinetic Energy) K = .5*m*v^2
(Potential Energy) U(spring) = .5*k*x^2
(Momentum) P = mv

The Attempt at a Solution


I'll use m for the mass of the bullet and M for the mass of the block.

So first I used conservation of momentum to assume that m*v(bullet) = (M+m)(v(final)).
Plugging in I got (.00812kg)(250m/s) = (.922kg+.00812kg)*v(final)
v(final) = 2.182514m/s

So then I assumed that the energy that the system has right after the bullet makes contact is fully kinetic, since in SHM all of the energy is kinetic when at the origin. I think I'm right in assuming this, but maybe that's where I went wrong. But anyways, continuing with what I took as the assumption, I then used the formula for kinetic energy.
K = .5*(M+m)(v(final))^2 So,
K = .5*(.922kg+.00812kg)*(2.182514m/s)^2 = 2.214492J

So then I went and assumed that all energy would be potential when the spring is fully compressed.

U = .5*k*x^2
2.214492J = .5*k*(.18m)^2
k = 136.697066N/m

So then I simply plugged the k into the formula for period and got:
T = 2*pi*sqrt((M+m)/k)
T = 2*pi*sqrt((.922kg+.00812kg)/136.697066N/m)
T = .518286s

Apparently this solution is wrong though, so I was wondering if anyone could help me out so that I could better understand this stuff. : /
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ggorrilla said:
So I've been working on this problem for a while and can't seem to come up with anything and I don't really understand why I'm wrong in what I did. I could just get the answer online, but I actually want to understand what's happening.

Homework Statement



A rifle bullet with mass 8.12g and initial horizontal velocity 250m/s strikes and embeds itself in a block with mass 0.992kg that rests on a frictionless surface and is attached to one end of an ideal spring. The other end of the spring is attached to the wall. The impact compresses the spring a maximum distance of 18.0cm. After the impact, the block moves in SHM. Calculate the period of this motion.

Homework Equations



(Period) T = 2pi*sqrt(m/k)
(Kinetic Energy) K = .5*m*v^2
(Potential Energy) U(spring) = .5*k*x^2
(Momentum) P = mv

The Attempt at a Solution


I'll use m for the mass of the bullet and M for the mass of the block.

So first I used conservation of momentum to assume that m*v(bullet) = (M+m)(v(final)).
Plugging in I got (.00812kg)(250m/s) = (.922kg+.00812kg)*v(final)
v(final) = 2.182514m/s

So then I assumed that the energy that the system has right after the bullet makes contact is fully kinetic, since in SHM all of the energy is kinetic when at the origin. I think I'm right in assuming this, but maybe that's where I went wrong. But anyways, continuing with what I took as the assumption, I then used the formula for kinetic energy.
K = .5*(M+m)(v(final))^2 So,
K = .5*(.922kg+.00812kg)*(2.182514m/s)^2 = 2.214492J

So then I went and assumed that all energy would be potential when the spring is fully compressed.

U = .5*k*x^2
2.214492J = .5*k*(.18m)^2
k = 136.697066N/m

So then I simply plugged the k into the formula for period and got:
T = 2*pi*sqrt((M+m)/k)
T = 2*pi*sqrt((.922kg+.00812kg)/136.697066N/m)
T = .518286s

Apparently this solution is wrong though, so I was wondering if anyone could help me out so that I could better understand this stuff. : /

I would certainly go about this problem the same way you have - so I would suggest re-checking your calculations in case there is a slip somewhere.
 
ggorrilla said:

Homework Statement



A rifle bullet with mass 8.12g and initial horizontal velocity 250m/s strikes and embeds itself in a block with mass 0.992kg ...


The Attempt at a Solution


I'll use m for the mass of the bullet and M for the mass of the block.

So first I used conservation of momentum to assume that m*v(bullet) = (M+m)(v(final)).
Plugging in I got (.00812kg)(250m/s) = (.922kg+.00812kg)*v(final)
/

Is the mass of the block 0.992 kg or 0.922 kg?

ehild
 
AAHHH! I can't believe that I didn't catch that, I reworked the entire problem for hours and couldn't find a way to get .557s, which was apparently the answer, but that was my mistake every single time. The correct mass is .992kg, I feel like such an idiot, thank you so much for the help!
 
ggorrilla said:
AAHHH! I can't believe that I didn't catch that,

Such things happen with everybody...:smile:


ehild
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
495
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K